[EPEL-devel]Re: TexLive

2015-11-23 Thread R P Herrold
On Sat, 21 Nov 2015, Germano Massullo wrote: > Did you try to ask them to include all TeXLive packages that are > available from upstream? If not, I can try there are lots of licenses to audit, per sub-package, and dependency trees of matter limited to non-commercial and so forth -- Russ

[EPEL-devel]Re: TexLive

2015-11-23 Thread R P Herrold
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Germano Massullo wrote: > You can simply re use the collection of texlive-scheme-full for Fedora > (non EPEL) One would assume so, but I found dependencies on non-free bits in there -- Russ herrold ___ epel-devel mailing list

[EPEL-devel]Re: TexLive

2015-11-23 Thread Germano Massullo
Il 23/11/2015 23:22, R P Herrold ha scritto: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2015, Germano Massullo wrote: > >> Did you try to ask them to include all TeXLive packages that are >> available from upstream? If not, I can try > there are lots of licenses to audit, per sub-package, and > dependency trees of matter

[EPEL-devel]Re: TexLive

2015-11-21 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 11/21/2015 04:22 AM, Germano Massullo wrote: Il 21/11/2015 04:56, Orion Poplawski ha scritto: On 11/20/2015 03:51 AM, Germano Massullo wrote: I saw https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/texlive/ that there is not texlive for EPEL7. But in a CentOS 7 installation, if I do "yum

[EPEL-devel]Re: TexLive

2015-11-21 Thread Germano Massullo
Il 21/11/2015 04:56, Orion Poplawski ha scritto: > On 11/20/2015 03:51 AM, Germano Massullo wrote: >> I saw https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/texlive/ that there >> is not texlive for EPEL7. >> But in a CentOS 7 installation, if I do "yum search texlive" you get >> many packages. They