Re: EPEL Amazon Linux and

2014-05-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:36:11AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: So I believe it's worthwhile to add some notes on EPEL page to alert the incompatibility. Something along the lines of: EPEL is built on unmodified RHEL, and will generally work on close rebuilds like CentOS. EPEL packages may

EPEL Amazon Linux and

2014-05-08 Thread Christopher Meng
Hi, I've seen the thread of LLVM on Amazon, recently I received a report that my package lnav doesn't work properly on Amazon Linux: lnav: undefined symbol: _ZN7pcrecpp2RE4InitEPKcPKNS_10RE_OptionsE From the symbol I can see there should be a problem in pcre package. Therefore here comes a

Re: EPEL Amazon Linux and

2014-05-08 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 09:45:12AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: I've seen the thread of LLVM on Amazon, recently I received a report that my package lnav doesn't work properly on Amazon Linux: lnav: undefined symbol: _ZN7pcrecpp2RE4InitEPKcPKNS_10RE_OptionsE From the symbol I can see there

Re: EPEL Amazon Linux and

2014-05-08 Thread Christopher Meng
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Quite a lot; they make no attempt at compatibility. I think I'd respond with that. EPEL packages might work on Amazon Linux, and they might not. Matthew, thanks for your reply. I took the info from the bug, and

Re: EPEL Amazon Linux and

2014-05-08 Thread Dave Johansen
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Quite a lot; they make no attempt at compatibility. I think I'd respond with that. EPEL packages might work on Amazon Linux, and they