List
Subject: Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:
On 11 September 2014 08:41, Bohuslav Kabrda
bkab...@redhat.commailto:bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
Problem trying to be solved:
EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues where
various packages end up having shorter lifetimes than
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
- EpSCO governance.
- Lifetime of initial committee (9 months?)
This is fine for me. Somewhere in the 6-12 month range seems reasonable.
-
- Replacement of any exiting members (replacement by
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:20:19 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
So this is my general proposal for per point release.
Problem trying to be solved:
EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues
where various packages end up having shorter lifetimes
On 5 September 2014 12:52, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:20:19 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
So this is my general proposal for per point release.
Problem trying to be solved:
EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/04/2014 02:05 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
Perhaps this is an issue where a shorter life-cycle expectation
needs to be set?
For anything related to the new repo, this is an important part of the
idea. We want to set a new expectation with the new
On 09/05/2014 12:49 AM, Karsten Wade wrote:
For anything related to the new repo, this is an important part of the
idea. We want to set a new expectation with the new brand. Maybe we
can just tie it to the upstream-of-Fedora -- 13 months, rolls with
each Fedora release, etc.?
It would look
On 4 September 2014 10:13, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:08:34 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
So in todays (2014-08-29) meeting, we wanted to move the various
policy discussions to email so that people could take their time to
reply and
So in todays (2014-08-29) meeting, we wanted to move the various policy
discussions to email so that people could take their time to reply and also
to allow for people who could not attend time to respond.
Going from the web-page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL-faster-repo-ideas the following
