[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 59 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8 tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6 55 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-a0ddb153b8 game-music-emu-0.6.2-1.el6 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-809dcc772f golang-1.11.5-1.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.13.rc6.el6 php-horde-Horde-Compress-2.2.2-1.el6 php-horde-Horde-Core-2.31.8-1.el6 php-horde-Horde-Mapi-1.0.9-1.el6 php-theseer-autoload-1.25.3-1.el6 recap-2.0.1-1.el6 Details about builds: drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.13.rc6.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-0667c3af7e) Provides a drop-down menu to most administrative tasks Update Information: https://www.drupal.org/project/admin_menu/releases/7.x-3.0-rc6 ChangeLog: * Mon Feb 11 2019 Shawn Iwinski - 3.0-0.13.rc6 - Update to 3.0-rc6 - Modernize spec * Thu Jan 31 2019 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.0-0.12.rc5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jul 12 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.0-0.11.rc5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Feb 7 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.0-0.10.rc5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 26 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.0-0.9.rc5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Feb 10 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.0-0.8.rc5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Feb 3 2016 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.0-0.7.rc5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jun 17 2015 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.0-0.6.rc5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild php-horde-Horde-Compress-2.2.2-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-7171eda489) Horde Compression API Update Information: **Horde_Compress 2.2.2** * [mjr] Remove dependency on Math_BigInteger. ChangeLog: * Mon Feb 11 2019 Remi Collet - 2.2.2-1 - update to 2.2.2 - drop patch merged upstream - use range dependencies php-horde-Horde-Core-2.31.8-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-2aa537e18c) Horde Core Framework libraries Update Information: **Horde_Core 2.31.8** * [mjr] Improve ActiveSync RESOLVERECIPIENT reqeuests. ChangeLog: * Mon Feb 11 2019 Remi Collet - 2.31.8-1 - update to 2.31.8 php-horde-Horde-Mapi-1.0.9-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-275e0f9eb1) MAPI utility library Update Information: **Horde_Mapi 1.0.9** * [mjr] No longer support Math_BigInteger, require the bcmath extension instead. ChangeLog: * Mon Feb 11 2019 Remi Collet - 1.0.9-1 - update to 1.0.9 - use range dependencies - drop dependency on Math_BigInteger - open https://github.com/horde/Mapi/pull/2 fix for tests php-theseer-autoload-1.25.3-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-89f2e39081) A tool and library to generate autoload code Update Information: **Release 1.25.3** * Fix [#83](https://github.com/theseer/Autoload/issues/83): Error with recursive Composer dependencies **Release 1.25.2** * Fix Parser to ignore "inline" use of keywords `class`, `interface` and `trait` **Release 1.25.1** * Merge PR [#81](https://github.com/theseer/Autoload/pull/81): Fix PHP 7.3 warnings [Remi] ChangeLog: * Mon Feb 11 2019 Remi Collet - 1.25.3-1 - update to 1.25.3 - add patch for PHP 5.3
[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL and RHEL High Availability / Resilient Storage
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:38 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 2/11/19 9:27 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > > Hi EPEL folks, > > > > There are some packages in CentOS 7 that did not ship in the main RHEL > > 7 Server product. > > > > Examples: > > > > python-jwt http://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:1032 > > python-adal https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:1042 > > > > This went into the "High Availability" and "Resilient Storage" add-ons > > of RHEL, not the usual RHEL Base/Optional/Extras. > > > > This means that CentOS 7 really includes the RHEL 7 HA and RS products. > > > > This also means that some EPEL 7 packages cannot install without these > > repos enabled on RHEL, see eg. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674764 > > > > Should EPEL's documentation include these two repos? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL > > Well, we have: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provided_within_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_or_layered_products.3F > > I am not sure this belongs on the front page... but it might be nice to > be more visible yeah. Cool, thanks for the confirmation! My teammates and I have hit this a couple times unfortunately. I've edited the front EPEL wiki page to instruct RHEL users to enable the HA repo in addition to Optional and Extras. - Ken ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Trying to figure out "internal" packages
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 2/3/19 11:48 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Over the weekend, tmz asked on IRC why their RHEL-6 build was >> failing when it had not failed previously. The problem was that >> the expat21 package was being seen in the buildroot and >> over-riding the RHEL-6 expat. >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpmlist?buildrootID=15142150%20=50=nvr=component >> >> This was due to a bug in the expat21 package, but the part that I >> am trying to figure out is why the following packages are shown >> as "internal" in the buildroot. >> >> expat21-2.1.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm internal >> expat21-devel-2.1.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm internal >> highlight-3.8-1.el6.x86_64.rpm internal >> pcre2-10.21-22.el6.x86_64.rpm internal >> pcre2-devel-10.21-22.el6.x86_64.rpm internal >> perl-IO-Tty-1.08-3.el6.x86_64.rpm internal >> >> The following do make sense: >> >> epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm internal >> epel-rpm-macros-6-21.noarch.rpm internal >> python2-rpm-macros-3-13.el6.noarch.rpm internal >> python-rpm-macros-3-13.el6.noarch.rpm internal >> python-srpm-macros-3-13.el6.noarch.rpm internal >> >> Are the above items where the buildrequires in a package are pulling >> them in or is there a buildroot directive adding them? > > "internal" here means local to koji, ie, in epel. > > expat21 is in epel. I have no idea why this bug wouldn't have hit > before, as expat21 hasn't been changed in many years, but it is in epel. I'm not sure either, but until recently (in the past month or two), this didn't affect koji. It still does not affect builds on el6 either via mock from a fedora host or directly via rpmbuild. For the local el6 builds, I used fedpkg --release el6 srpm and then yum-builddep on the srpm to install the deps. However, Carl George filed a bug report on this last June: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585248 In that report he noted that yum-builddep was a symlink to dnf-utils. On the f27/f28/f29 systems I tested, yum-utils had been installed, so perhaps that is one of the important differences which keeps this from affecting normal epel users and many local/mock builds? Installing epel-release and then running yum install expat-devel also doesn't pull in expat21. I thought this might be because expat from base is already installed, so I installed expat-devel-2.0 and then ran yum update expat-devel and still don't get expat21 pulled in. In any case, is there an audit trail that shows when (and perhaps why) expat21 was added to the internal koji repo? It seems like it should be removed from there if it's manually tagged into that location. Björn, have you had any luck on the CVE's affecting expat21 so an update dropping the expat-devel provides can be submitted? -- Todd signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL and RHEL High Availability / Resilient Storage
On 2/11/19 9:27 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > Hi EPEL folks, > > There are some packages in CentOS 7 that did not ship in the main RHEL > 7 Server product. > > Examples: > > python-jwt http://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:1032 > python-adal https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:1042 > > This went into the "High Availability" and "Resilient Storage" add-ons > of RHEL, not the usual RHEL Base/Optional/Extras. > > This means that CentOS 7 really includes the RHEL 7 HA and RS products. > > This also means that some EPEL 7 packages cannot install without these > repos enabled on RHEL, see eg. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674764 > > Should EPEL's documentation include these two repos? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL Well, we have: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provided_within_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_or_layered_products.3F I am not sure this belongs on the front page... but it might be nice to be more visible yeah. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Trying to figure out "internal" packages
On 2/3/19 11:48 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Over the weekend, tmz asked on IRC why their RHEL-6 build was > failing when it had not failed previously. The problem was that > the expat21 package was being seen in the buildroot and > over-riding the RHEL-6 expat. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpmlist?buildrootID=15142150%20=50=nvr=component > > This was due to a bug in the expat21 package, but the part that I > am trying to figure out is why the following packages are shown > as "internal" in the buildroot. > > expat21-2.1.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm internal > expat21-devel-2.1.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm internal > highlight-3.8-1.el6.x86_64.rpm internal > pcre2-10.21-22.el6.x86_64.rpm internal > pcre2-devel-10.21-22.el6.x86_64.rpm internal > perl-IO-Tty-1.08-3.el6.x86_64.rpm internal > > The following do make sense: > > epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm internal > epel-rpm-macros-6-21.noarch.rpm internal > python2-rpm-macros-3-13.el6.noarch.rpm internal > python-rpm-macros-3-13.el6.noarch.rpm internal > python-srpm-macros-3-13.el6.noarch.rpm internal > > Are the above items where the buildrequires in a package are pulling > them in or is there a buildroot directive adding them? "internal" here means local to koji, ie, in epel. expat21 is in epel. I have no idea why this bug wouldn't have hit before, as expat21 hasn't been changed in many years, but it is in epel. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] EPEL and RHEL High Availability / Resilient Storage
Hi EPEL folks, There are some packages in CentOS 7 that did not ship in the main RHEL 7 Server product. Examples: python-jwt http://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:1032 python-adal https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:1042 This went into the "High Availability" and "Resilient Storage" add-ons of RHEL, not the usual RHEL Base/Optional/Extras. This means that CentOS 7 really includes the RHEL 7 HA and RS products. This also means that some EPEL 7 packages cannot install without these repos enabled on RHEL, see eg. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674764 Should EPEL's documentation include these two repos? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
