The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
63 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-9191f31d36
python-waitress-1.4.3-1.el8
4
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ba899b9717
golang-1.19.6-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-cd6dc8dccf
wordpress-5.1.16-1.el7
1
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 3:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> just a heads up that according to
> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhel-app-streams-life-cycle#rhel8_application_streams
> the Python 3.8 application stream will be retired in May 2023 (I suppose at
> the
Hello folks,
just a heads up that according to
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhel-app-streams-life-cycle#rhel8_application_streams
the Python 3.8 application stream will be retired in May 2023 (I suppose at the
end).
$ repoquery -q --repo=epel8 --whatrequires
On 18. 05. 23 13:25, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 3:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello folks,
just a heads up that according to
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhel-app-streams-life-cycle#rhel8_application_streams
the Python 3.8 application stream will be retired in
On Thu, 18 May 2023 at 09:52, Jos de Kloe wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
Thank you very much for sending a detailed upgrade email to the list
covering why the upgrade is happening, etc.
> I think an update of the epel eccodes packages is needed, since ECMWF
> will be starting to generate data files
Dear all,
I think an update of the epel eccodes packages is needed, since ECMWF
will be starting to generate data files soon that can only be accessed
using this version.
As stated on this page:
https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/COPSRV/Implementation+of+IFS+cycle+48r1+for+CAMS
"To handle
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote:
> Am 15.05.23 um 20:50 schrieb Jonathan Wright:
> > EPEL tracks RHEL, not clones.
> >
> > EPEL10 is likely to resolve this, however. Ref
> > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal
> >