Re: EPEL Updating llvm/clang?

2013-12-01 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2013/12/2 Dave Johansen :
> Currently, llvm/clang in the EPEL repo has been orphaned and I was
> considering packaging YouCompleteMe (
> https://github.com/Valloric/YouCompleteMe ) for EL, but if requires clang
> 3.2 or higher and so I was wondering if it would be possible for me
> llvm/clang to be updated to 3.3. I have spoken with the Fedora maintainer
> (ajax) and he was ok with the idea, but said that it would need approval. I
> have made the necessary updates to the .spec file of llvm 3.3 so it will
> build on EL 6 and would be happy with becoming the maintainer if this was
> approved.

Providing LLVM ver. 2.x nowadays sounds a joke so I'd rather update it
to a very recent version. Also it's a leafnode standalone
application(s) which makes updating even simpler.


-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: EPEL Updating ODB in ?

2013-12-01 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All!

2013/12/2 Dave Johansen :
> I recently submitted ODB 2.2 to the EPEL for EL 5/6 and version 2.3 has been
> released (
> http://codesynthesis.com/pipermail/odb-announcements/2013/37.html ). The
> wiki seems to indicate that updating software for feature releases is
> discouraged (
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases ), so is
> updating ODB to 2.3 in the EPEL not really possible? Assuming that's the
> case, is there a recommended solution for maintaining access to newer
> versions of ODB for EL users?

ODB is still a "young" package (in terms of existing in EL
repositories) so I would update it anyway. However in the future ypu'd
better to provide parallel-installable odb30, odb40 etc packages.


-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


EPEL Updating llvm/clang?

2013-12-01 Thread Dave Johansen
Currently, llvm/clang in the EPEL repo has been orphaned and I was
considering packaging YouCompleteMe (
https://github.com/Valloric/YouCompleteMe ) for EL, but if requires clang
3.2 or higher and so I was wondering if it would be possible for me
llvm/clang to be updated to 3.3. I have spoken with the Fedora maintainer
(ajax) and he was ok with the idea, but said that it would need approval. I
have made the necessary updates to the .spec file of llvm 3.3 so it will
build on EL 6 and would be happy with becoming the maintainer if this was
approved.

As of right now, it looks like there isn't anything in the EPEL that
depends on llvm/clang, so at least from this perspective it shouldn't be
that big of a deal.

Here's the command I ran to find dependencies and its output:
repoquery -q --whatrequires --recursive --resolve --repoid=epel llvm
llvm-0:2.8-14.el6.i686
clang-0:2.8-14.el6.i686
clang-analyzer-0:2.8-14.el6.
i686
clang-devel-0:2.8-14.el6.i686
clang-doc-0:2.8-14.el6.noarch
llvm-devel-0:2.8-14.el6.i686
llvm-doc-0:2.8-14.el6.noarch
llvm-ocaml-0:2.8-14.el6.i686
llvm-ocaml-devel-0:2.8-14.el6.i686
llvm-ocaml-doc-0:2.8-14.el6.noarch

Thanks,
Dave
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


EPEL Updating ODB in ?

2013-12-01 Thread Dave Johansen
I recently submitted ODB 2.2 to the EPEL for EL 5/6 and version 2.3 has
been released (
http://codesynthesis.com/pipermail/odb-announcements/2013/37.html ).
The wiki seems to indicate that updating software for feature releases is
discouraged (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases ), so is
updating ODB to 2.3 in the EPEL not really possible? Assuming that's the
case, is there a recommended solution for maintaining access to newer
versions of ODB for EL users?
Thanks,
Dave
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: EPEL Planning for LTSP -6

2013-12-01 Thread Christopher Meng
Any results here?

I just received CVE alert of nbd, so Fedora nbd package will be
updated now, what about the nbd in EPEL?

We still lack nbd.ko on RHEL machine...

PS. felicitate myself on searching my inbox before tried to update it ;)
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel