On 5 September 2014 12:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:20:19 -0600
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > So this is my general proposal for per point release.
> >
> >
> > Problem trying to be solved:
> >
> > EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues
> > wher
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:20:19 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> So this is my general proposal for per point release.
>
>
> Problem trying to be solved:
>
> EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues
> where various packages end up having shorter lifetimes than can be
>
On 5 September 2014 08:27, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>- EpSCO governance.
>> - Lifetime of initial committee (9 months?)
>>
>> This is fine for me. Somewhere in the 6-12 month range seems reasonable.
>
I am going to t
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
>- EpSCO governance.
> - Lifetime of initial committee (9 months?)
>
> This is fine for me. Somewhere in the 6-12 month range seems reasonable.
>-
> - Replacement of any exiting members (replacement by formal v
