[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel5 (2015-09-21)

2015-09-21 Thread opensource
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel6 (2015-09-21)

2015-09-21 Thread opensource
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2015-09-21)

2015-09-21 Thread opensource
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Haïkel
Hi, Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about EPEL's future. Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, there was little progress on that topic After a discussion with a Smooge, I decided to come with a proposal, knowing that 1. Fedora wants to keep EPEL within it

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:12:07 +0200 Haïkel wrote: > Hi, > > Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about > EPEL's future. Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, > there was little progress on that topic > > After a discussion with a

Re: [EPEL-devel] [CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/21/2015 07:12 AM, Haïkel wrote: > * EPEL will use CentOS repositories instead of mirroring RHEL > repositories Worth noting that one of the values people get (or perceive) about EPEL is that it is built against RHEL repositories. This is really

Re: [EPEL-devel] [CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Dave Johansen
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Haïkel wrote: > Hi, > > Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about EPEL's > future. > Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, there was little > progress on that topic > > After a discussion with a

Re: [EPEL-devel] [CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Haïkel
2015-09-21 16:38 GMT+02:00 Dave Johansen : > > > I'm a maintainer of several EPEL packages and a CentOS user. After reading > through this, I don't understand the value in this shift. Also, what are the > potential negatives of the change? > Thanks, > Dave > I don't see

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Haïkel
2015-09-21 19:46 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi : > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:12:07 +0200 > Haïkel wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about >> EPEL's future. Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, >> there