[EPEL-devel] [OT] Re: Re: EPEL Proposal #1: Rechartering

On 02/18/2016 01:39 PM, Bryan J Smith wrote: Non-Red Hat customers running CentOS usually have a much easier task of enabling EPEL, although there can still be some issues. Yes it is a bit odd to me that the free CentOS is in many respects easier to use than the paid RHEL. Would be nice

[EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/26/2016 05:01 AM, john tatt wrote: > Hi > > Do you think you will build it also for i386 arch ? > > Thx > > I don't think COPR supports 32-bit for EPEL-7 ... So, no plans at the moment. - -- GPG Key - E5C8BC67 - --- -BEGIN

[EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/27/2016 03:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:17:39 + (UTC) john tatt > wrote: > >> Hi I sis a yum install xfce4* . Maybe xfwm4 was not in the >> dependencies ? > > Thats not going to work. Xfce has

[EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

Hi I sis a yum install xfce4* . Maybe xfwm4 was not in the dependencies ? J De : Kevin Fenzi À : epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc : john tatt Envoyé le : Samedi 27 février 2016 21h02 Objet : [EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion

[EPEL-devel] Re: Virtual packages providing python2-*

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:50:42 -0600 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I'm actually just going to submit a review for a python2-setuptools > dummy package to take care of the most annoying case. If someone > really dislikes this idea enough to block that, then I guess I'll > find

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL Proposal #1: Rechartering

Q: Do you understand the purpose of RHSCL PR EPEL? ;) You want RHEL, but neither RHSCL nor EPEL is it, nor designed to be it. That's why I said ... EPEL's ideal aimpoint, when feasible, should be like RHSCL. ;) -- bjs DISCLAIMER: Sent from phone, please excuse any typos -- Bryan J Smith -

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL Proposal #1: Rechartering

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Felix Schwarz wrote: > Also as a sysadmin I dislike that stuff in EPEL can change at any time > (whenever the maintainer can not support the old version anymore). If EPEL had > some kind of "release" (e.g. tied to RHEL point releases)

[EPEL-devel] Re: Old scl-utils packages?

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 26 February 2016 at 21:01, Dave Johansen > wrote: > > It looks like EPEL 5/6 have old versions of scl-utils. Those are probably > > added back at a point when the base OS didn't have

[EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

Hi it seems to come without windows manager. Had to uninstall. De : Mukundan Ragavan À : epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 26 février 2016 0h15 Objet : [EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7 -BEGIN PGP