The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
621 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
383 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
102
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
499 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
493 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
425
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
740 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849
sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5
383 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-edbea40516
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el5
355
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> This is my first pass at finding the conflicts with between EPEL-7
> x86_64 and the RHEL repos 'rhel-7-server-extras-rpms',
> 'rhel-7-server-optional-rpms', 'rhel-7-server-rpms',
> 'rhel-ha-for-rhel-7-server-rpms'.
>
This is my first pass at finding the conflicts with between EPEL-7
x86_64 and the RHEL repos 'rhel-7-server-extras-rpms',
'rhel-7-server-optional-rpms', 'rhel-7-server-rpms',
'rhel-ha-for-rhel-7-server-rpms'.
There do not seem to be any places where EPEL packages would replace
packages in those