[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 01:26 Todd Zullinger, wrote: > James Hogarth wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote: > >> Red Hat announced today that Ansible was being deprecated > >> from the extras channel. Their advice is that those who > >> have "previously installed Ansible and its dependencies from > >> the Extras channel are advised to enable and update from the > >> Ansible Engine channel, or uninstall the packages as future > >> errata will not be provided from the Extras channel." > >> > >> https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1075 > >> > >> Given that, I believe it is reasonable to see ansible return > >> to EPEL. This was discussed in previous EPEL meetings a > >> bit, so I'm sure it was known to at least some of the folks > >> involved. > > > > Cheers for the info. > > > > It wasn't mentioned on the devel list, I didn't see it in the 7.5 release > > notes and it was still in extras when I checked a short while ago. > > > > In that case yes I agree it makes total sense to return to epel7 > > > > I wonder why they dropped it when the whole point of them bringing it in > to > > begin with was for Satellite and Tower to have it in the standard RHEL > > repos. > > > > Seems so pointless to have only had one release there! > > Indeed, it was a bit strange. Perhaps someone with more > insight into the rationale can comment. I have no > particular knowledge of things, but maybe keeping a fast > moving project like ansible in even the RHEL extras channel > was a problem. > > Maybe the plan with the move to the "Ansible Engine" channel > is to work closer with subscribers on migrating from version > to version. And non-subscribers can just follow it in EPEL. > > I'd be interested in hearing more about the change, though I > suspect those who know more either aren't on these lists or > can't say more than Red Hat's advisory has already. > > At this point, no offense to Nirik and the maintenance he does on the package, I'm actually tempted to just grab it from upstream directly at https://releases.ansible.com/ansible/rpm/ At least then I can get consistency with selection of stable, preview or nightly ... > ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7
James Hogarth wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote: >> Red Hat announced today that Ansible was being deprecated >> from the extras channel. Their advice is that those who >> have "previously installed Ansible and its dependencies from >> the Extras channel are advised to enable and update from the >> Ansible Engine channel, or uninstall the packages as future >> errata will not be provided from the Extras channel." >> >> https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1075 >> >> Given that, I believe it is reasonable to see ansible return >> to EPEL. This was discussed in previous EPEL meetings a >> bit, so I'm sure it was known to at least some of the folks >> involved. > > Cheers for the info. > > It wasn't mentioned on the devel list, I didn't see it in the 7.5 release > notes and it was still in extras when I checked a short while ago. > > In that case yes I agree it makes total sense to return to epel7 > > I wonder why they dropped it when the whole point of them bringing it in to > begin with was for Satellite and Tower to have it in the standard RHEL > repos. > > Seems so pointless to have only had one release there! Indeed, it was a bit strange. Perhaps someone with more insight into the rationale can comment. I have no particular knowledge of things, but maybe keeping a fast moving project like ansible in even the RHEL extras channel was a problem. Maybe the plan with the move to the "Ansible Engine" channel is to work closer with subscribers on migrating from version to version. And non-subscribers can just follow it in EPEL. I'd be interested in hearing more about the change, though I suspect those who know more either aren't on these lists or can't say more than Red Hat's advisory has already. -- Todd ~~ I'm not fat. I am a nutritional overachiever. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 01:13 James Hogarth, wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote: > >> James Hogarth wrote: >> > I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible >> > from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL >> > policy is not to conflict. >> > >> > I was surprised just now to see ansible 2.5.0 on a test centos system, >> > when it wasn't in extras, and on a little bit of a search found: >> > >> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7ef392255b >> > >> > Of course this is a bit of an issue for CentOS/RHEL users that have >> > need for the Red Hat ansible as they have been upgraded, and RH will >> > need to epoch bump (or release 2.5.1 and we pull this from EPEL7 then) >> > to ensure they get it from the right repo. >> > >> > With a branch retirement shouldn't this have been blocked in koji? >> >> Red Hat announced today that Ansible was being deprecated >> from the extras channel. Their advice is that those who >> have "previously installed Ansible and its dependencies from >> the Extras channel are advised to enable and update from the >> Ansible Engine channel, or uninstall the packages as future >> errata will not be provided from the Extras channel." >> >> https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1075 >> >> Given that, I believe it is reasonable to see ansible return >> to EPEL. This was discussed in previous EPEL meetings a >> bit, so I'm sure it was known to at least some of the folks >> involved. >> > > Cheers for the info. > > It wasn't mentioned on the devel list, I didn't see it in the 7.5 release > notes and it was still in extras when I checked a short while ago. > > In that case yes I agree it makes total sense to return to epel7 > > I wonder why they dropped it when the whole point of them bringing it in > to begin with was for Satellite and Tower to have it in the standard RHEL > repos. > > Seems so pointless to have only had one release there! > > And having read the bugzilla entry now... they moved it to its own product channel that all RHEL subscribers have access to... Again this feels so very pointless. > ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7
James Hogarth wrote: > I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible > from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL > policy is not to conflict. > > I was surprised just now to see ansible 2.5.0 on a test centos system, > when it wasn't in extras, and on a little bit of a search found: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7ef392255b > > Of course this is a bit of an issue for CentOS/RHEL users that have > need for the Red Hat ansible as they have been upgraded, and RH will > need to epoch bump (or release 2.5.1 and we pull this from EPEL7 then) > to ensure they get it from the right repo. > > With a branch retirement shouldn't this have been blocked in koji? Red Hat announced today that Ansible was being deprecated from the extras channel. Their advice is that those who have "previously installed Ansible and its dependencies from the Extras channel are advised to enable and update from the Ansible Engine channel, or uninstall the packages as future errata will not be provided from the Extras channel." https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1075 Given that, I believe it is reasonable to see ansible return to EPEL. This was discussed in previous EPEL meetings a bit, so I'm sure it was known to at least some of the folks involved. -- Todd ~~ Time may be a great healer, but it's a lousy beautician. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 140 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e64eeb6ece nagios-4.3.4-5.el7 18 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1fbdf7f103 chromium-65.0.3325.181-1.el7 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2074629ed3 drupal7-7.58-1.el7 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-e12bc7bed5 nodejs-6.14.0-1.el7 libuv-1.19.2-1.el7 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7c95e7ac21 libofx-0.9.9-2.el7 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-13062a4d15 wordpress-4.9.5-1.el7 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-e56f478565 koji-1.15.1-1.el7 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-9f8e93d154 python-jwt-1.6.1-1.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2c81054303 remctl-3.14-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing freshmaker-0.0.15-2.el7 jpegoptim-1.4.5-1.el7 libappindicator-sharp-12.10.0-12.el7 nbdkit-1.2.1-1.el7 python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure-0.24.0-1.el7 Details about builds: freshmaker-0.0.15-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-acd7068bd7) Freshmaker is a service scheduling rebuilds of artifacts as new content becomes available. Update Information: Use Koji build source instead of Koji task source if available. jpegoptim-1.4.5-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-11012c2e9d) Utility to optimize JPEG files Update Information: v1.4.5 - fix `--overwrite` option, - better error reporting for `-d` option - fix memcmp() potentially reading past end of buffer - some minor fixes References: [ 1 ] Bug #1562503 - jpegoptim-1.4.5 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562503 libappindicator-sharp-12.10.0-12.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f3e1ef48f4) Application indicators library - C# Update Information: Mono C# bindings for the libappindicator library. This was split from the original package when it was moved to RHEL. nbdkit-1.2.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1e9e31ed4e) NBD server Update Information: New stable version 1.2.1. Move to stable branch version 1.2.0. python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure-0.24.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-92455aaf1d) Metadata providers for Fedora Infrastructure's fedmsg deployment Update Information: Update to 0.24.0 Changelog is at: https://github.com/fedora- infra/fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure/blob/develop/CHANGELOG.rst#0240 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Ansible in EL7
Hi all, I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL policy is not to conflict. I was surprised just now to see ansible 2.5.0 on a test centos system, when it wasn't in extras, and on a little bit of a search found: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7ef392255b Of course this is a bit of an issue for CentOS/RHEL users that have need for the Red Hat ansible as they have been upgraded, and RH will need to epoch bump (or release 2.5.1 and we pull this from EPEL7 then) to ensure they get it from the right repo. With a branch retirement shouldn't this have been blocked in koji? Cheers, James ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-e4e96fbf3f drupal7-7.58-1.el6 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b5d9f8f571 wordpress-4.9.5-1.el6 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-870a92fcc5 koji-1.15.1-1.el6 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-5aca1d385d remctl-3.14-1.el6 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-158680d651 python-gunicorn-18.0-2.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing jpegoptim-1.4.5-1.el6 python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure-0.24.0-1.el6 python34-3.4.8-1.el6 Details about builds: jpegoptim-1.4.5-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-02ca609742) Utility to optimize JPEG files Update Information: v1.4.5 - fix `--overwrite` option, - better error reporting for `-d` option - fix memcmp() potentially reading past end of buffer - some minor fixes References: [ 1 ] Bug #1562503 - jpegoptim-1.4.5 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562503 python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure-0.24.0-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-e4d78e2e09) Metadata providers for Fedora Infrastructure's fedmsg deployment Update Information: Update to 0.24.0 Changelog is at: https://github.com/fedora- infra/fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure/blob/develop/CHANGELOG.rst#0240 python34-3.4.8-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-dd6e4a3f0b) Version 3 of the Python programming language aka Python 3000 Update Information: Update to 3.4.8 security release ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-04-11 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: The EPEL Steering Committee will have a weekly meeting to cover current tasks and problems needed to keep EPEL going. Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/8724/ ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] No EPSCO meeting 2018-04-11
Kevin, Brian, Jim Perrin and I are at the Fedora Infrastructure Hackfest and it is wall to wall meetings. I am unable to do anything towards getting a meeting together. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL 7.5 fallout
Do you have any information that htis is EPEL packages or just EL7.5 items? On 10 April 2018 at 09:57, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm seeing this in the root.log of some packages: > > DEBUG util.py:439: Error: initscripts conflicts with > 1:redhat-release-server-7.4-1.x86_64 > > -- > Orion Poplawski > Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 > NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 > 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com > Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ > ___ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] RHEL 7.5 fallout
I'm seeing this in the root.log of some packages: DEBUG util.py:439: Error: initscripts conflicts with 1:redhat-release-server-7.4-1.x86_64 -- Orion Poplawski Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: CMake 3.11.0 on epel7
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hello everyone. > > I wish to update CMake3 to the version 3.11.0 on epel7. > SRPM: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/cmake3-3.11.0-1.fc27.src.rpm > > Any objection about? Not from me. I support a module upstream (out of necessity because I needed it fixed) and they seem to have a "fixes forward" culture. I was discouraged from backporting the fix in a patch because it would create a different behavior on Fedora from other distros and was instead encouraged to work around the problem (use a fixed local copy). So we should probably stay on the latest minor/patch release for the major version of the package, in this case 3. Thanks, Richard ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] CMake 3.11.0 on epel7
Hello everyone. I wish to update CMake3 to the version 3.11.0 on epel7. SRPM: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/cmake3-3.11.0-1.fc27.src.rpm Any objection about? -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
