[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

Ken Taylor wrote: > On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Ken Taylor wrote: >> >>> I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning on a >>> newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go fine. >>> If I may ask two questions... >>> >>> Does this version of

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

good idea, EPIC release --> rhel release, centOS release keep the old RPMS when EPIC package upgrade. no compatibility issue any more. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

On 17 May 2018 at 18:11, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:36:17PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> I have been worried about a negative feedback loop here on packagers. >> This is a new technology and packagers aren't usually people who care >>

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:36:17PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I have been worried about a negative feedback loop here on packagers. > This is a new technology and packagers aren't usually people who care > about EPEL. Having them to deal with multiple OS's they don't use > makes it more

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

On 17 May 2018 at 15:31, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 03:06:43PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Modules > [...] >> EPIC-next >> >>The tooling for modules can match how Fedora approaches it. This >>means that rules for module

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Ken Taylor wrote: I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning on a newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go fine. If I may ask two questions... Does this version of wine support 32 bit Windows programs on