On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:03 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> At some point it appears that appdata files moved from
> /usr/share/appdata to /usr/share/metainfo. Does the libappstream-glib
> library or whatever cares about appdatafiles in RHEL7
> (libappstream-glib-0.7.8-2.el7) work with
Hello Stephen,
Yes, we have the conntrack-tools in our Red Hat Satellite repository, and we
can apply it outside of our Satellite process; by manually copying the rpm to
each server and installing outside of our process.
The issue is the interworking of the metatdata in the conntrack-tools
Hello,
When I go to https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/ I sometimes
get redirected to https://mirror.cedia.org.ec/epel/7/SRPMS/, which is giving
me a 404 right now.
Could this mirror be excluded from the redirects for SRPMs?
Or its admins be contacted to rsync SRPMs also?
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
144 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
35 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-6bc3a525a2
libmad-0.15.1b-26.el6
0
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 09:00:18AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/01/2018 06:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:24:35AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 06:00, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:57:29PM
On 11/01/2018 06:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:24:35AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 06:00, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:57:29PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
=
OCAML
=
So I would like for our future to be similar to this.. where we can
work out how various releases are updated/rebuilt during minor
releases. I am looking for ideas on how we can best implement this in
the future.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Anssi Johansson
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:24:35AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 06:00, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:57:29PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > =
> > > OCAML
> > > =
> > > package: llvm-ocaml-3.4.2-8.el7.x86_64 from
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 06:00, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:57:29PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > =
> > OCAML
> > =
> > package: llvm-ocaml-3.4.2-8.el7.x86_64 from epel-base
> > unresolved deps:
> > ocaml(runtime) = 0:4.01.1
> > ocaml(Unix) =
Thank you for that explanation. I think we are going to need some way
to track our exceptions better as this isn't the first time we have
had to deal with this and what you are doing would be a good path
forward. However for future RHEL we should work out a way to remove
nbdkit in the future.
On
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:57:29PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> =
> OCAML
> =
> package: llvm-ocaml-3.4.2-8.el7.x86_64 from epel-base
> unresolved deps:
> ocaml(runtime) = 0:4.01.1
> ocaml(Unix) = 0:93736a394d3d85d6d127fe238ddc6092
> ocaml(Pervasives) =
You missed nbdkit, but please read this email first:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/B4RKEC62ODYF4K6RGXHP3L3GHNKGQ6KM/
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and
nbdkit is our super-flexible, pluggable NBD server. Read more about
it here:
https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit
https://rwmj.wordpress.com/?s=nbdkit
This package is in EPEL, and was added to RHEL 7.6.
Now unfortunately (owing to my screw up) we added a lower NVR to RHEL
7.6 than is
13 matches
Mail list logo
