[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2019-08-12 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing indent-2.2.12-4.el8 pugixml-1.9-1.el8 python-ratelimitingfilter-1.1-3.el8 robin-map-0.6.1-2.el8 will-crash-0.12-3.el8 Details about builds:

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 17:47, Troy Dawson wrote: > Looks like you need at least fedpkg-1.37-3.el7 for it to work with the > playground stuff, so you should be good. > When I did the branches for KDE (about 350 of them) there were 6 that > didn't properly branch to epel8-playground. > They *said*

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-12 Thread Troy Dawson
Looks like you need at least fedpkg-1.37-3.el7 for it to work with the playground stuff, so you should be good. When I did the branches for KDE (about 350 of them) there were 6 that didn't properly branch to epel8-playground. They *said* they were branched, but they weren't. I was able to push and

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-12 Thread Dave Dykstra
Hi Kevin, I have fedpkg-1.37-4.el7, the latest version. My yum log shows I updated it from 1.37-2 on August 6 an hour and a half before I started this thread. If I recall correctly I saw an instruction somewhere that said to update it, and I did that before my initial attempt. Dave On Sun,

[EPEL-devel] RHEL-7.7 problems

2019-08-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
This release has had a multitude of problems this release. * The python3 problems were caused because there were complaints that the python36 was conflicting with the RHEL-7 python3 causing build problems. The maintainers removed python36 to try and fix this and broke centos consumers who relied

[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing python-rpm-macros>3.30 on EPEL7 ppc64le

2019-08-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 07:21, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 08. 19 11:13, Antonio Trande wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > 'python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7' requires 'python(2)-rpm-macros > 3-30' on > > EPEL7 ppc64le only? > > > > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing python-rpm-macros>3.30 on EPEL7 ppc64le

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 13:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 08. 19 11:13, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. 'python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7' requires 'python(2)-rpm-macros > 3-30' on EPEL7 ppc64le only? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=36879492=DEFAULT=root.log=-4000 Funny thing: ppc64le

[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing python-rpm-macros>3.30 on EPEL7 ppc64le

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 08. 19 11:13, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. 'python-devel-2.7.5-86.el7' requires 'python(2)-rpm-macros > 3-30' on EPEL7 ppc64le only? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=36879492=DEFAULT=root.log=-4000 Funny thing: ppc64le gets: Problem: conflicting requests -

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3 packages to be removed form EPEL 7 (provided by RHEL 7)

2019-08-12 Thread Tuomo Soini
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:52:34 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: > > python3_other is now defined to 3 in rhel7.7. > > By what? Do you mean python3_pkgversion? W can override that as well. Sorry. python3_pkgversion. -- Tuomo Soini Foobar Linux services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

2019-08-12 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 12. 08. 19 11:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 12. 08. 19 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > >>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > See for

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 11:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 12. 08. 19 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: See for example:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

2019-08-12 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 12. 08. 19 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> See for example: > >> > >> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/python-mccabe?collection=epel7 > >> 2019-08-11

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3 packages to be removed form EPEL 7 (provided by RHEL 7)

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 10:52, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 12. 08. 19 8:14, Tuomo Soini wrote: On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 22:26:45 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: %python3_other_pkgversion 34 I believe the easiest fix is to define that directly in epel-rpm-macros:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 11:12, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: See for example: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/python-mccabe?collection=epel7 2019-08-11 07:50:11 - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.6 ... This is provided in RHEL 7.7. (Note

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

2019-08-12 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > See for example: > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/python-mccabe?collection=epel7 > 2019-08-11 07:50:11 > > - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.6 ... > > This is provided in RHEL 7.7. > > (Note that we've unretired the

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3 packages to be removed form EPEL 7 (provided by RHEL 7)

2019-08-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 12. 08. 19 8:14, Tuomo Soini wrote: On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 22:26:45 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: %python3_other_pkgversion 34 I believe the easiest fix is to define that directly in epel-rpm-macros: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/5 Correct. That fixes this

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3 packages to be removed form EPEL 7 (provided by RHEL 7)

2019-08-12 Thread Tuomo Soini
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 22:26:45 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: > %python3_other_pkgversion 34 > > I believe the easiest fix is to define that directly in > epel-rpm-macros: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/5 Correct. That fixes this issue but not the huge issue we