The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-4ca0c60e5b
mbedtls-2.16.3-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el8
fmf-0.8-1.el8
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 4:04 PM Timotheus Pokorra
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> We currently still have Mono 4.6 in Epel7, and no Mono in Epel8 yet [1].
>
> I suggest that I bootstrap Mono 5.18 for Epel8. [4]
> That is the version that is delivered with Debian 10 "Buster" [2], and I
> guess it will
Hello all,
We currently still have Mono 4.6 in Epel7, and no Mono in Epel8 yet [1].
I suggest that I bootstrap Mono 5.18 for Epel8. [4]
That is the version that is delivered with Debian 10 "Buster" [2], and I
guess it will get some kind of long term support.
When that goes well, I would also
Hi,
I've reported packages I've found missing so fare (right now), but I may add
some in the future.
Don't get me wrong I don't blame EPEL for their effort, I'm so happy that it
exists that I'll do my best to help at least by reporting bugs in the most
constructive way I can.
For now, I'm
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:59:33PM +0200, fil...@centrum.cz wrote:
> I'm on server using munin software and I notice that this
> package is missing from EPEL for CentOS 8.
>
> I'm trying to build this package in my local mock from Fedora 31
> package, but it fails on perl dependencies.
>
> What
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:45:24AM +, LAHAYE Olivier wrote:
> For docbook-utils-pdf, I don't understand why redhat did drop it, and
> I wonder how can EPEL publish only the missing part without breakage if
> redhat updates the 1st half.
This is the burden of a downstream distributor. You
Hello,
I'm on server using munin software and I notice that this
package is missing from EPEL for CentOS 8.
I'm trying to build this package in my local mock from Fedora 31
package, but it fails on perl dependencies.
What can I do to cowork on this package to be in EPEL repository.
With best
Thanks for your help, I'll request packages like xmlstarlet.
For docbook-utils-pdf, I don't understand why redhat did drop it, and I wonder
how can EPEL publish only the missing part without breakage if redhat updates
the 1st half. Anyway, I'll also request it. Aside that, I'll try to learn and
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:34:27AM +, LAHAYE Olivier wrote:
> Unfortunately, I've discovered with centos-8 that many (I really mean MANY)
> packages have been dropped by redhat
Yes, that happens.
> and epel as well.
EPEL did not drop anything. EPEL for a new RHEL always starts with an empty
Hi
I'm Main developper ofSystemImager a software that is aimed at image deployment
on cluster client nodes (and other computer by extension):
https://github.com/finley/SystemImager/wiki
https://github.com/finley/SystemImager/wiki/ScreenShots
It is based on dracut+plymouth for the imager and
Dne 30. 09. 19 v 10:20 fil...@centrum.cz napsal(a):
Hello
I install mock in CentOS 8 and there is no config file for CentOs 8,
will there be some provided?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-eab983bd46
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno,
Hello
I install mock in CentOS 8 and there is no config file for CentOs 8,
will there be some provided?
With best regards,
Filip Bartmann
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
12 matches
Mail list logo
