Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi said:
> Does this mean if there's a package foo that is a rhel package, but not
> in a module, that it can be overlapped with a foo package thats in a
> epel non default module? ie, does it only mean the modular case or does
> it mean any rpm?
As a consumer of EPEL,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 07:54:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I've been saying this for a while as if it's fact, but of course it's not
> actually fact until approved, so I'm puting this to the EPEL team to
> hopefully do so.
>
> The current guidelines * say:
>
>EPEL packages should only
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:23:52AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello EPEL.
>
> It seems that we have a python38-devel module in the RHEL 8.2 Beta Code
> Ready Builder repository. It has only one stream but it is not a default
> stream due to some technical limitations.
>
> Can we please enable
