On 14. 04. 20 18:46, Troy Dawson wrote:
Yep, I'm having a hard time finding anything relevant to test.
I have verified it doesn't conflict with any other rpm macro, but I'm
pretty sure you had already checked that.
So, I'm giving it a thumbs up.
And I'll give it a thumbs up on the pull requests a
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:27 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 04. 20 17:40, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 8:30 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 14. 04. 20 15:56, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >>> Hi Miro,
> >>> I've taken a look, but haven't done any testing.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
>
On 14. 04. 20 17:40, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 8:30 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 04. 20 15:56, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi Miro,
I've taken a look, but haven't done any testing.
Thanks.
EPEL6 patch - no. Even if it works, I'd say no. We're at the last 7
months before EOL and
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 8:30 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 04. 20 15:56, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Hi Miro,
> > I've taken a look, but haven't done any testing.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > EPEL6 patch - no. Even if it works, I'd say no. We're at the last 7
> > months before EOL and I don't want the EPEL6
On 14. 04. 20 15:56, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi Miro,
I've taken a look, but haven't done any testing.
Thanks.
EPEL6 patch - no. Even if it works, I'd say no. We're at the last 7
months before EOL and I don't want the EPEL6 stuff to have changes
like this. I could be outvoted by this, but I bel
Hi Miro,
I've taken a look, but haven't done any testing.
EPEL6 patch - no. Even if it works, I'd say no. We're at the last 7
months before EOL and I don't want the EPEL6 stuff to have changes
like this. I could be outvoted by this, but I believe most of the
other EPEL packagers would feel this
On 14. 04. 20 13:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Miro.
EPEL is interested in Fedora compatibility but has 0 people staffed to it. I
got slammed by the datacentre move and dropped the ball on this. Troy took over
for me last month and has been trying to catch up on all the things we have
outs
I am not yet a packager, but I would love to help out!
-Original Message-
From: Felix Schwarz
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 7:57 AM
To: EPEL Development List ; Justin Coffman
Subject: [EPEL-devel] Re: Request EPEL8 branch for "tinyfugue"
Hi Justin,
Am 12.04.20 um 03:40 schrieb Justin
Hi Justin,
Am 12.04.20 um 03:40 schrieb Justin Coffman:
> There’s a bug currently open requesting that “tinyfugue” be packaged for EPEL
> 8.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762158
>
> There hasn’t been any response to the original requestor since it was opened
> in October. It’
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 06:08, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 01. 20 15:36, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hey EPEL experts. Could you please have a look at:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/13
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/14
> >
On 02. 01. 20 15:36, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hey EPEL experts. Could you please have a look at:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/13
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/14
Thanks.
Is EPEL interested in Fedora compatibility? Or shall I stop
11 matches
Mail list logo
