The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
626 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
368 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
366 https://bodhi.fedoraproje
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7f0ce51dbd
python-bleach-3.1.4-2.el8
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-72116e7775
chromium-81.0.4044.122-1.el8
7 https://bodhi.f
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:48:54AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
>
> On 5/1/20 1:10 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do
> > > we
> > > expect eve
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 9:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 04. 20 19:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 14. 04. 20 18:46, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >> Yep, I'm having a hard time finding anything relevant to test.
> >> I have verified it doesn't conflict with any other rpm macro, but I'm
> >> pretty sur
On 5/1/20 1:10 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do we
expect every package in EPEL8 to also be built for EPEL8-playground, either
through package.cfg or by buildi
On 14. 04. 20 19:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 04. 20 18:46, Troy Dawson wrote:
Yep, I'm having a hard time finding anything relevant to test.
I have verified it doesn't conflict with any other rpm macro, but I'm
pretty sure you had already checked that.
So, I'm giving it a thumbs up.
And I'll
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 08:39:48PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Anyone willing to take over ngircd for EPEL?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830182
Sure. I can do that. Will add it to my list.
kevin
___
epel-devel mailing list -- e
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do we
> expect every package in EPEL8 to also be built for EPEL8-playground, either
> through package.cfg or by building directly from the epel8-playgroun
Le 01/05/2020 à 04:39, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
> Anyone willing to take over ngircd for EPEL?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830182
On a side note : this package is appreciated here.
Last week I published a detailed article about NgIRCd running on CentOS 7.
https://blog.micr