The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2f9004588a
chromium-87.0.4280.88-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
xe-guest-utilities-latest-7.21.0-1.el7
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5dd76178df
libslirp-4.3.1-2.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e44d8312da
rclone-1.53.3-1.el8
4
On 12/12/20 12:12 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
At the end a package called qgpgme-devel will be built in EPEL and available in
the EPEL buildroot despite the fact that there is a qgpgme-devel package in RHEL
buildroot.
Since the only reason we don't allow this already is policy, why don't we amend
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 1:44 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/11/20 7:42 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Our current solution for the missing RHEL8 devel packages is going away.
> > And let's be honest, it was only about 50% successful. We needed
> > something else anyway.
> >
> > Here is my proposal
On 12/11/20 7:42 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Our current solution for the missing RHEL8 devel packages is going away.
And let's be honest, it was only about 50% successful. We needed
something else anyway.
Here is my proposal for a new solution.
Be warned, this proposal has words like module, and
Hello. I used the sata_via kmod to install centos 8 in an old desktop that
otherwise wouldn't find the drive. I had probably at least two kernel updates
since that went without issues.
Then when upgrading to centos 8.3 the kernel went from 4.18.193 to 4.18.240 and
this new kernel would drop me
Our current solution for the missing RHEL8 devel packages is going away.
And let's be honest, it was only about 50% successful. We needed
something else anyway.
Here is my proposal for a new solution.
Be warned, this proposal has words like module, and grobisplitter.
But I think it will turn out
