The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0bb4947962
zchunk-1.2.2-1.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a55cc9e04f
stb-0-0.8.20211022gitaf1a5bc.el8
The following builds
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e7404b9cd7
zchunk-1.2.2-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1e126c870e
stb-0-0.8.20211022gitaf1a5bc.el7
The following builds
Hi Sérgio,
We aren't sure if you saw this or not, but you have permission to move
ahead with the re-builds.
Let us know if you need help with anything.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 3:06 PM Carl George wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 5:17 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at
Looks like your orig message didn't get to epel-devel, perhaps you
aren't subscribed?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 04:03:20PM +0200, Michael Trip wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> What does that mean for the ansible rpm package in general? Do we have
> to remove the ansible RPM from our systems and install
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 6:29 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 3:49 PM Amos wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 4:57 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'll echo smooge here. Can you expand on exactly what you are
>>> hitting?
>>>
>>> I can't seem to find the orig thread
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:48:47 -0700
Troy Dawson wrote:
> gnucash-2.6.21-1.el72018-04-15 (1466)
Should be safe to unpush this one because gnucash-2.6.21-4.el7 should
be in epel7 stable for 2 years:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-aa8e8965dc
Paul.
That shows how much I've read the policies in detail. That got transferred
over to the regular (non-wiki) docs
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy/#a_yet_again_little_bit_bigger_minor_version_updates
That policy in particular is for updates that do not have ABI changes, but
