[EPEL-devel] Re: update Ceph to 12.1.1 in epel7 ?

2017-08-03 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 08/01/2017 01:05 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 1 August 2017 at 12:32, Jeffrey Ollie > wrote: Building 12.1.1 for EPEL7 would be VERY bad IMNSHO. 0.80.7 _is_ seriously out of date, but: [snip] I will bring this up at the meeting

[EPEL-devel] update Ceph to 12.1.1 in epel7 ?

2017-08-01 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
The last version of Ceph that was built in epel7 was 0.80.7, back in December, 2016. That's pretty seriously out of date. Is anyone going to have any heartache if I build 12.1.1 for epel7? -- Kaleb ___ epel-devel mailing list --

[EPEL-devel] Re: update Ceph to 12.1.1 in epel7 ?

2017-08-01 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 08/01/2017 01:05 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I will bring this up at the meeting tomorrow, but I believe that the plan would be something like the following: 1. "Update" the current package with README.deprecated explaining why the package is being removed from the repository and

[EPEL-devel] recent builds of glusterfs in epel-7

2017-08-08 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
I've noticed that puiterwijk and kevin have done builds recently of glusterfs. It's unclear to me why anyone would do that. I don't mind really, but I want remind everyone that glusterfs was retired from EPEL when RHEL started to ship glusterfs client-side RPMs. The correct place to get el7

[EPEL-devel] Re: update Ceph to 12.1.1 in epel7 ?

2017-08-17 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 08/01/2017 01:05 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I will bring this up at the meeting tomorrow, but I believe that the plan would be something like the following: 1. "Update" the current package with README.deprecated explaining why the package is being removed from the repository and

[EPEL-devel] retiring nfs-ganesha and libntirpc from EPEL

2017-05-15 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
Hi, I'm considering $subject. 1) the nfs-ganesha pkgs in EPEL are mildly crippled due to missing glusterfs -devel and ceph -devel packages in RHEL or EPEL. (The gluster -devel packages are not in the RHEL base channel, and probably won't ever be.) And they haven't been updated in a long time.

[EPEL-devel] retiring Ceph in EPEL-7

2017-09-11 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-a4e3aae817 The package build I made with a README.deprecated has reached 14+ days in testing in bodhi. There was a single comment by anonymous to the effect that RHEL7 has ceph-94.5 with a -1 karma vote which appears to have not been