-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/19/2014 12:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
xfdesktop-4.10.2-2.el7.src.rpm
package: xfdesktop-4.10.2-2.el7.x86_64 from epel unresolved deps:
desktop-backgrounds-basic
Sorry! I got delayed with this. I will take care of this today.
Mukundan.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi All,
I would like some clarification from folks here regarding updating
gparted on EPEL-5 and EPEL-6.
The version of gparted shipped in EPEl-5 is 0.4.8 and EPEL-6 is 0.6.0
while the current upstream version is 0.19.1 (which I recently built
in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/27/2016 03:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:17:39 + (UTC) john tatt
> wrote:
>
>> Hi I sis a yum install xfce4* . Maybe xfwm4 was not in the
>> dependencies ?
>
> Thats not going to work. Xfce has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/26/2016 05:01 AM, john tatt wrote:
> Hi
>
> Do you think you will build it also for i386 arch ?
>
> Thx
>
>
I don't think COPR supports 32-bit for EPEL-7 ... So, no plans at the
moment.
- --
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---
-BEGIN
On 02/28/2016 02:35 AM, john tatt wrote:
> Ok
>
> I tried a yum grouplist and didn't see any xfce4-desktop
>
> So I'll try again asap.
>
>
That should be xfce-desktop (notice it's xfce not xfce4).
See example below -
$ yum groups info xfce-desktop
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/28/2016 07:34 AM, LOEFFLER Peter wrote:
> hi,
>
> xfce 4.12 in epel 7 would be perfect! i set up a fresh centos 7
> and did a "yum groups install xfce-desktop" even with a "yum
> install gnome-icon-theme gnome-icon-theme-symbolic
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
All,
I have built Xfce 4.12 packages for EL-7 on COPR. The link for the
repo is
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/xfce412-epel7/
I would appreciate it if people can install the packages and give it a
spin. Please report any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/24/2016 11:58 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 06:35 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I have built Xfce 4.12 packag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Reminder to test Xfce 4.12 packages for EPEL-7.
Hello all,
Just wanted to send out a reminder to test Xfce 4.12 packages from
COPR for EPEL-7. You will need to have updated to EL-7.2 before
installing the packages from this COPR.
Specifically,
It has been almost a month since I sent an email[1] about testing Xfce
4.12 packages on EL-7. I have seen a few emails with requests for
packages but no emails about issues that folks had in using the same on
EL-7.
Given this scenario, I am encouraged to do the official builds. Towards
that, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:17:11 +0800
Suse Shi wrote:
> well I was also working on XFCE@EL7
>
> compiling rpms by myself, with xfce 4.10
>
> but having a small bug on latest networkmanager package.(crashed
> net-access)
> Im
I had written earlier [0] about the availability of Xfce 4.12 packages
in EPEL testing repositories. This is a reminder for the same.
Link to update -
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-262a3f39e1
Some notes from [0] are worth repeating here -
- libxfce4ui obsoletes
On 04/28/2016 01:05 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 04/18/2016 04:10 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> After a trial run involving a COPR repo [1], I had written earlier
>> indicating that I started doing real builds of Xfce 4.12 packages for
>&
On 04/28/2016 08:47 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mukundan,
>>
>> Dependencies for you to fix.
>>
>> -T
>>
>>
>>
>> Scientific Linux 7.2, x64
>>
>> yum --enablerepo=* update
>> --> Finished Dependency Reso
It has been while since I sent an email[1] about testing Xfce
4.12 packages on EL-7. I have seen a few emails with requests for
packages but no emails about issues that folks had in using the same on
EL-7.
I had sent out an earlier email about the official packages [2] but got
side tracked. I
All,
After a trial run involving a COPR repo [1], I had written earlier
indicating that I started doing real builds of Xfce 4.12 packages for
EL-7 [2]. This is now complete and I have now submitted a update - a
mega update containing 53 packages total.
We would like to update SuperLU to version 5.x in EPEL 7. This would
introduce a soname change for libsuperlu. The packages that depend on
SuperLU are armadillo and hypre.
I have created a COPR [1] where we have built all three packages. They
seem to build fine. If they are issues that others
The package "itstool" seems to be missing in some architectures (s390x
and aarch64) although it should be provided by RHEL server rpms. It
appears to be available in x86_64 and ppc64le.
I noticed this when building gparted. See the failed build here -
It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only in x86_64 and powerpc 64
architectures. Due to this, some of my builds fail. This one for example
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39545162
Is using excludearch my only option? How can I get this built?
Thanks,
Mukundan.
On 12/16/19 9:37 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:19:16PM -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>>> It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only in x86_64 and powerpc 64
>>> architectures. Du
Scratch build of gtkhash does not appear to pull in libb2-0.98.1. Has
the buildroot override expired?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45077601
On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Mukundan, your package misses.
> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or
On 5/28/20 2:25 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> How is it possible? What happened with the libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 build:
>
> $ koji list-history --build libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31
> Fri May 22 20:48:12 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 tagged into
> f31-updates-candidate by sagitter
> Fri May 22 20:54:19 2020
On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Mukundan, your package misses.
> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or let me commit
> changes to it.
>
Hi Antonio,
This is done. Please add gtkhash to your update as well.
Hi all,
I have a COPR containing xfce 4.16 packages for EPEL-8 packages [0]. I
would like to get some testing done using this COPR before getting into
EPEL-8.
Please email if and when you notice problems and I will try to fix it as
soon as possible.
As a reminder - xfce 4.16 will be
On 2/15/21 7:02 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
Mukundan -
Just a note that as mentioned on the CentOS list here:
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2021-February/353317.html
# dnf group install Xfce
Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:24 ago on Mon 15 Feb 2021
03:41:53 PM MST
On 2/15/21 5:50 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 2/7/21 8:56 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
Hi all,
I have a COPR containing xfce 4.16 packages for EPEL-8 packages [0]. I
would like to get some testing done using this COPR before getting
into EPEL-8.
Please email if and when you notice
I forgot to email about this. Here are official buils of Xfce 4.16 on EPEL8
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3f7925eb01
I am hoping to push this to stable in about a week. Please test.
--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I have a packaging question -
One of the packages I maintain, nextcloud-client, fails to execute in
EPEL-9. It is being blocked by SELinux policy.
getsebool selinuxuser_execmod is off in EL9.
Is it even allowed to change SELinux rule in, for example, %post?
I suspect the correct way to do
On 9/15/22 21:47, Carl George wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 8:46 PM Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I have a packaging question -
One of the packages I maintain, nextcloud-client, fails to execute in
EPEL-9. It is being blocked by SELinux policy.
getsebool selinuxuser_execmod is off in EL9
29 matches
Mail list logo