from:"Richard Grainger"

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.6: RHEL 7.7 vs. CentOS 7.6 EPEL7 retirement problem

2019-08-10 Thread Richard Grainger

> On 10 Aug 2019, at 20:23, Miro Hrončok  wrote:
> 
> While I really tried to do my best, it seems that I broke CentOS by retiring 
> python36. Should it be unretired? Or is it reasonable to say: Please wait for 
> CentOS 7.7?

This is why I believe we need a “CentOS-EPEL” repo that mirrors EPEL generally, 
but that is frozen in the period between a RHEL and CentOS release.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Getting package into stable

2018-08-02 Thread Richard Grainger

This package has been in testing for a month:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-69e2ee28b8

Can anyone push it to stable?

Thanks!
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z6J3UZ6IG4WUI3ZR2JFVIUCX7MH4F5G7/

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

2018-06-11 Thread Richard Grainger

Thanks for the confirmation Ken! For the benefit of others, the repo
should work with or without epel.  If you do have epel, wine32
coexists with wine64. Wine64 has the priority for the wine command
under the "alternatives" system. The i686 dependencies for wine32
coexist fine using the RHEL/CentOS multilib support (their versions
exactly match their x86_64 counterparts in epel).
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:55 PM Ken Taylor  wrote:
>
> Thank you Mr. Grainger!!!
>
> I have just conducted a test as follows:
>
> 1 - fresh install CentOS 7.5 - minimal installation
> 2 - update and reboot
> 3 - add epel repository and yum-priorities
> 4 - set CentOS-Base priority=1, epel priority=10
> 5 - groupinstall "X Window system" mate-desktop-environment (issue with
> atril - skipped)
> 6 - systemctl set-target graphical.target and reboot
> 7 - installed your repo
> "ttps://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/wine32-release.rpm" and set
> priority=9
> 8 - yum -y install wine.i686
> 9 - installed and tested a known 32 bit Windows program (GrabIt - a
> usenet nzb downloader). Works perfectly!
>
> I have a couple of other Windows programs which I will test but I think
> we can declare success.
>
> Thank you again,
>
> Ken Taylopr
>
> On 06/10/2018 07:47 PM, Richard Grainger wrote:
> > I've finally updated the wine32 repo for CentOS 7.5 (which has 32 bit
> > rebuilds of the required epel packages).  Details here:
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/harbottle/wine32
> > https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
> >
> > Hope this helps!
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:46 AM Ken Taylor  
> > wrote:
> >> I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning  on a
> >> newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go fine.
> >> If I may ask two questions...
> >>
> >> Does this version of wine support 32 bit Windows programs on CentOS 7.5?
> >>
> >> If so, would someone please be kind enough to point me to some
> >> instructions as to how to configure the 32 bit environment?  I have
> >> tried configuring it as I would on Ubuntu but without luck.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Ken Taylor
> >> ___
> >> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > ___
> > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/S76SYQTSSSBZRRIKV5WLZPKTUMWCKR6N/
>
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RS6FWXRHWZ472TIDCXYOVZAKSFDPMMCS/
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QI7YBA6IHFXHIWXAAEZF4DH2YF26E5D7/

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

2018-06-10 Thread Richard Grainger

I've finally updated the wine32 repo for CentOS 7.5 (which has 32 bit
rebuilds of the required epel packages).  Details here:

https://gitlab.com/harbottle/wine32
https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/

Hope this helps!
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:46 AM Ken Taylor  wrote:
>
> I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning  on a
> newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go fine.
> If I may ask two questions...
>
> Does this version of wine support 32 bit Windows programs on CentOS 7.5?
>
> If so, would someone please be kind enough to point me to some
> instructions as to how to configure the 32 bit environment?  I have
> tried configuring it as I would on Ubuntu but without luck.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken Taylor
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/S76SYQTSSSBZRRIKV5WLZPKTUMWCKR6N/

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug report for dbus-c++-devel

2018-06-08 Thread Richard Grainger

On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Anssi Johansson  wrote:
> So this is a FTBFS bug (fails to build from source). The package maintainer
> will need to address this issue eventually, for example when the package
> needs to be rebuilt to fix some other bug. In this view the bug is useful as
> a "heads up" that there is something to take into account.

Fair enough. This is useful information with regards to the utility of
filing similar bug reports in future.

> If you need to use the same 0.5.0 version as is currently in EPEL, you may
> need to set up a separate 7.0.1406 (or perhaps something slightly newer)
> build environment for this package.

Yes, this is the case and yes, although inconvenient, this is what I
will do.  Many thanks for your help with this.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/G6LORD6PQASBZ5S2UMENUG67TXIKYYTD/

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug report for dbus-c++-devel

2018-06-08 Thread Richard Grainger

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Anssi Johansson  wrote:

> The dbus-c++ packages were built in March 2014. Perhaps the dependencies
> have changed since then, causing the errors? Perhaps it builds better with
> CentOS 7.0.1406.

Is it considered a bug if you cannot build an EPEL package with the
current point release of CentOS or is it not? My understanding is that
older point releases are not supported or is that incorrect?

> I also wonder about the "high" priority of your bug. Why do you need to
> compile the rpm yourself? Is "yum install dbus-c++-devel" not possible?

Well...I just need to...for my own reasons. The issue is high priority
to me, but I won't be offended if the priority is lowered by an admin
on bugzilla.

> Apart from that, providing hints for how to fix the compilation would no
> doubt speed up resolving the bug.

I'm sure it would. I'm afraid I can't help there.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VMX2XNMQ27JIK4DBB5KVICHMQ23J3QPH/

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

2017-08-23 Thread Richard Grainger

OK, thanks,

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Anssi Johansson <e...@miuku.net> wrote:

> Anssi Johansson kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 13.31:
>
>> Richard Grainger kirjoitti 23.8.2017 klo 11.55:
>>
>>> yum install nodejs
>>>
>>
>> Try with this:
>>
>> yum install nodejs --enablerepo=epel-testing
>>
>> This will install nodejs with http-parser bundled in. http-parser was
>> removed from EPEL because it is now in RHEL 7.4, and EPEL does not ship
>> packages that are also in RHEL. http-parser will be in CentOS 7.4 once it
>> is released.
>>
>
> I forgot to mention that this is only a temporary workaround. Once CentOS
> 7.4 is released, nodejs will revert back to depending on http-parser from
> RHEL/CentOS.
>
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] nodejs broken

2017-08-23 Thread Richard Grainger

Hi

Dependencies for nodejs seem to be broken currently on CentOS 7.  Are EPEL
builds for 7.4 still ongoing?:

[root@b4982b06b5fd /]# yum install nodejs
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, ovl
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirror.as29550.net
 * epel: mirrors.coreix.net
 * extras: mirror.freethought-internet.co.uk
 * updates: mirror.freethought-internet.co.uk
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package nodejs.x86_64 1:6.11.1-1.el7 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: npm = 1:3.10.10-1.6.11.1.1.el7 for package:
1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libuv >= 1:1.9.1 for package:
1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: http-parser >= 2.7.0 for package:
1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libuv.so.1()(64bit) for package:
1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libicuuc.so.50()(64bit) for package:
1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libicui18n.so.50()(64bit) for package:
1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libicudata.so.50()(64bit) for package:
1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libhttp_parser.so.2()(64bit) for package:
1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libicu.x86_64 0:50.1.2-15.el7 will be installed
---> Package libuv.x86_64 1:1.10.2-1.el7 will be installed
---> Package nodejs.x86_64 1:6.11.1-1.el7 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: http-parser >= 2.7.0 for package:
1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libhttp_parser.so.2()(64bit) for package:
1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64
---> Package npm.x86_64 1:3.10.10-1.6.11.1.1.el7 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: 1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64 (epel)
   Requires: libhttp_parser.so.2()(64bit)
Error: Package: 1:nodejs-6.11.1-1.el7.x86_64 (epel)
   Requires: http-parser >= 2.7.0
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Debian tools on epel7

2017-03-25 Thread Richard Grainger

That's really cool!  If you want to add "apt" commands to that list, I
contributed to a working apt rpm here:
https://gitlab.com/christj/apt-rpmbuild

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> Hi,
> I build for  epel 7 several Debian tools that may allow build deb
> packages, now I can build some debs  in epel 7, If someone is
> interested in testing let me have some feedback .
>
> po-debconf-1.0.16-8.nmu3.el7
> smokeqt-4.14.3-7.el7
> smokegen-4.14.3-6.el7
> perl-Qt-4.14.3-5.el7
> debconf-1.5.56-6.el7
> debhelper-9.20150628-4.el7
> dpkg-1.17.27-1.el7
> perl-File-FcntlLock-0.22-6.el7
> perl-Mail-Box-2.120-2.el7
> perl-User-Identity-0.96-1.el7
> perl-Object-Realize-Later-0.19-6.el7
> perl-Mail-Transport-Dbx-0.07-28.el7
> perl-Geography-Countries-2009041301-17.el7
> debmirror-2.16-4.el7
> dh-make-1.20140617-2.el7
> pbuilder-0.228.3-2.el7
> perl-Git-Wrapper-0.047-3.el7
> perl-Parse-DebControl-2.005-10.el7
> sensible-utils-0.0.9-5.el7
> devscripts-2.16.5-1.el7
> dh-autoreconf-13-2.el7
> cdbs-0.4.150-3.el7
> po-debconf-1.0.16-9.nmu3.el7
> debian-keyring-2014.3-4.el7
> jetring-0.25-2.el7
> keyrings-filesystem-1-6.el7
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d90518ab91
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-a0a16db403
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-73abc671aa
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-f883af5b55
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-cababed3d2
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-c837a68c52
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-43496f6ce3
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-2ef0ea428d
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-788760d644
>
> also we got alien
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-bdf2b8d718
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug in rubygem-multipart-post package

2016-12-04 Thread Richard Grainger

Hi, this still hasn't been fixed.  How do I get my patch accepted?

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Anssi Johansson <e...@miuku.net> wrote:
> 22.10.2016, 0.12, Richard Grainger kirjoitti:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I've posted a bug and patch for this package spec here:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386644
>>
>> No reply so far.  Was that the right place to file the bug?
>
>
> Yes, it was filed correctly. Sometimes it may take a few days for a packager
> to react to filed bugs.
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.6: RHEL 7.7 vs. CentOS 7.6 EPEL7 retirement problem

[EPEL-devel] Getting package into stable

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug report for dbus-c++-devel

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug report for dbus-c++-devel

[EPEL-devel] Re: nodejs broken

[EPEL-devel] nodejs broken

[EPEL-devel] Re: Debian tools on epel7

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug in rubygem-multipart-post package

10 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information