I ran repoclosure between the base CentOS release and EPEL-6 for i386 and
x86_64. The following packages are listed as having broken dependencies. I
figure I would get this ready for Fridays meeting.
1:gnumeric-1.10.10-2.el6.1.i686
OpenImageIO-1.2.3-3.el6.i686
airinv-1.00.0-2.el6.i686
The list for 7 is a lot shorter (yay)
1:python-flask-0.10.1-3.el7.noarch
datagrepper-0.4.2-1.el7.noarch
geard-0-0.16.gite2502a6.el7.x86_64
pipelight-selinux-0.1.0-2.el7.noarch
python-docker-py-0.4.0-3.el7.x86_64
thunderbird-24.7.0-1.el7.x86_64
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
repoclosure.epel-7-x86_64
Are there any items I need to add to the Friday Epel Steering Committee
meeting on Friday?
Thanks
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Sorry for the delay
===
#epel: EPEL
===
Meeting started by smooge at 16:00:57 UTC. The full logs are available
athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/epel/2014-09-05/epel-weeklym-meeting-2014-09-05.2014-09-05-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* Robot Roll Call
On 5 September 2014 12:52, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:20:19 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
So this is my general proposal for per point release.
Problem trying to be solved:
EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run
On 4 September 2014 14:34, Jude Oliver ju...@blansys.com wrote:
Good day, it appears that the current version of Wine on epel, 1.7.22,
does not work for creating a 32 bit wineprefix on RHEL 7. It appears this
is needed to run some windows applications, like Adobe Acrobat reader.
It appears
On 4 September 2014 10:13, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:08:34 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
So in todays (2014-08-29) meeting, we wanted to move the various
policy discussions to email so that people could take their time to
reply
We will be holding our weekly EPEL meeting tomorrow at 1600 UTC.
Topics will be:
1) Discussion of current EPEL policies
2) Discussion of proposed EPEL policy changes
3) Discussion of consolidation and rewrite of EPEL pages.
4) Open Flood.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
#epel: EPEL (2014-08-29)
Meeting started by smooge at 16:00:13 UTC. The full logs are available
athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/epel/2014-08-29/epel_weekly_meeting.2014-08-29-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* meet and
So in todays (2014-08-29) meeting, we wanted to move the various policy
discussions to email so that people could take their time to reply and also
to allow for people who could not attend time to respond.
Going from the web-page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL-faster-repo-ideas the following
We will be holding our weekly EPEL meeting tomorrow at 1600 UTC.
Topics will be:
1) EPEL-7 moves out of Beta
2) EPEL.fill-in-blank
3) Open Flood.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/22/2014 01:34 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Next meeting: 2014-09-30 16:00 UTC
#epel: EPEL meeting (2014-08-22)
Meeting started by smooge at 16:00:09 UTC (full logs).
The link
On 21 August 2014 08:46, Gabriel Eisele gabrieleis...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hallo,
I hope i’m at the righte place. I have a questetion about EPEL.
My questtion is, it is possible to use an old EPEL Version (for example
EPEL 6) with a new Enterprise Linux Version (for example CentOS 7) .
The
On 21 August 2014 09:20, Brice Burgess ne...@iceburg.net wrote:
Will denyhosts be added to epel7 or is the plan to centralize on fail2ban
(which is already in epel7)? In the past I've relied on denyhbosts for
securing against brute force ssh login attempts c -- and its part of my OS
boot
I am proposing that the EPEL community hold a meeting in #epel on Friday
August 22, 2014 16:00:00 UTC to go over various community items:
Suggested topics:
#topic Forking of EPEL packages to a faster moving repository
a) Proposed name of repository is EPIC
b) What packages stay, which packages
On 14 August 2014 09:46, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com wrote:
last week, libmodplug got retired from EPEL (both 5 and 6), see
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5960
But our users seem to miss it, it broke
I am proposing that the EPEL community hold a meeting in #epel on Friday
August 22, 2014 16:00:00 UTC to go over various community items:
Suggested topics:
#topic Forking of EPEL packages to a faster moving repository
a) Proposed name of repository is EPIC
b) What packages stay, which packages
On 13 August 2014 06:28, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 01:25:04 +0200
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 August 2014 21:56, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
* Example: When RHEL7.1 comes out we have a 30 day window to get
packages
At FLOCK this year, I did a short workshop on what was labeled EPEL.Next.
At that we went over a bit of what EPEL has done in the past, what its
current challenges are, and what could be its future. Toshio Kuratomi was
great in capturing what was said at the meeting and
EPEL
* Extra packages
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
Date: 12 August 2014 21:05
Subject: EPEL Notes from .next discussion.
To: EPEL development disccusion epel-devel-l...@redhat.com,
epel-users-l...@fedoraproject.org
At FLOCK this year, I did a short workshop
On 12 August 2014 18:52, Brian Stinson bstin...@ksu.edu wrote:
I know that this proposal needs a lot more fleshing out, but I think it
covers the use cases many users of EPEL need for long term usage of
packages.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Were there plans made (at flock or elsewhere)
On 25 June 2014 09:28, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:23:24 -0700
Jeff Sheltren j...@tag1consulting.com wrote:
Awesome, thanks!
Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7 builds into the normal
git/koji/bodhi workflow? Is that waiting on a CentOS release,
On 16 June 2014 12:10, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
One thing I missed in the RHEL7 release was that there is a repository
now called 'rhel-extras'.
For RHEL6 this contains upgrade packages (for in place rhel6-rhel7
upgrades).
For RHEL7 this contains (for now) docker and
On 16 June 2014 16:59, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote:
On 06/16/2014 02:49 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
In previous releases CentOS was inserting in the distribution all the
packages that make up the full spectrum of RHEL variants, so in version 6
it included for example the
It was pointed out in IRC that the list of packages at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7/Requests was getting rather long.
The problem currently is that we have moved to a package database and the
existing scripts are needing to be ported to the new API. This is taking
some time but once
On 30 April 2014 07:51, Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote:
I wonder if the softwarecollections.org repos might be a better choice
for this. All the userspace tools already exist in 5, 6 and 7.
Pat
I am thinking that softwarecollections and EPEL may have competing
solutions to the same
On 30 April 2014 08:46, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 07:22:40PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Finally:
python34-3.4
This has precedent.
The main reason I chose this when doing the mediawiki packages was to avoid
parsing problems due to the fact
On 6 March 2014 13:24, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 03/06/2014 10:24 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Hi,
Will the subject packages be included in epel 7? I don't see them
listed on the web pages at
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/SRPMS/repoview/
tia
Someone
On 18 October 2013 12:32, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
Before long RHEL will ship selected client-side-only glusterfs RPMs and it
will become necessary to withdraw glusterfs (and hekafs) packages from EPEL.
If you haven't followed along in fedora-devel, here's (what I think
On 7 June 2013 05:53, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2013 10:21 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
Hey, just a heads up
the package Django has been deprecated or EPEL5 and EPEL6. On
EPEL6, you can use Django14 as well, if you
On 7 June 2013 10:48, Karsten 'quaid' Wade kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Just to continue down this path for a moment, what are the ways we can
track or get ideas of what is important to EPEL users? If we could
improve what we have already, how would we do so? (Let's pretend for a
moment that we
501 - 531 of 531 matches
Mail list logo
