Matthew Miller wrote:
> This all leads me to think that actually what we want is not "EPEL Stream"
> but "EPEL for Stream".
That seems to be true.
> (epel-for-stream? epel-4-stream? epel4s? no not that last one for sure.)
Please, no "4"! It look
also avoid the risk that one program might invoke the wrong
build of another program.
Björn Persson
pgpyLtaHSqWWa.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
f we could assemble a team of
interested maintainers.
Björn Persson
pgpGcJuYYL9Aq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedorapr
o some small
degree.
Björn Persson
pgpSdMxQshB3h.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Con
but their purpose isn't to be comprehensive documentation.
Various aspects of how macros are expanded and spec files are parsed
can only be learned through experimentation. So imitating others' spec
files is the only realistic way to learn how
in EL6.
Björn Persson
pgpGgkZ4eEqC4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
opensou...@till.name wrote:
> Please orphan the affected package or retire your package to avoid
> broken dependencies.
Wouldn't the option of adopting the orphan package also be worth
mentioning?
Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: PG
iveArch: noarch %{GNAT_arches}
noarch allows the build to work, and GNAT_arches is the list of
architectures to distribute the package for. I haven't tried it in EPEL
but it seems to work in Fedora 18, 19 and Rawhide.
Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
