[EPEL-devel] Re: Current state of dual repository packages.

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Simone Caronni <negativ...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If I trigger the rebuild in Koji, we will get again the same version as > the first one. > What will the CentOS folks do for these rebuilds? Regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new ocea

[EPEL-devel] Re: Current state of dual repository packages.

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Simone Caronni <negativ...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> The remaining packages which are not in all architectures BUT are very >> old (and may break

[EPEL-devel] Re: Current state of dual repository packages.

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > The remaining packages which are not in all architectures BUT are very old > (and may break other things). These need some sort of update/rebuild I > expect. > > libssh > libtomcrypt > libtommath > libvncserver >

[EPEL-devel] speexdsp update overwrites part of a RHEL 7 package

Hello, a package entered stable that overwrites part of a RHEL 7 package. The bug is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396841 As originally reported, the contributor has not replied in 10 days so I'm reporting the thing here. I would consider this an urgent bug; as it's

Re: [EPEL-devel] Koji build errors (all releases - el5/6/7)

On 15 May 2015 at 10:42, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, don't know if it has been reported already, but I have 3 weird errors on Koji while scratch building some packages. Please note that last time the same packages built fine. - el5 ignores debug files and does

[EPEL-devel] Koji build errors (all releases - el5/6/7)

Hello, don't know if it has been reported already, but I have 3 weird errors on Koji while scratch building some packages. Please note that last time the same packages built fine. - el5 ignores debug files and does not assemble the debuginfo package (?):

Re: [EPEL-devel] Koji build errors (all releases - el5/6/7)

On 15 May 2015 at 12:03, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: Looks to me like that sub-package has an arch-specific dependency but it's a noarch sub-package. Gotcha. Thanks for spotting!! Does not create any problem if you install from the same mock build as the dependency will be stuck

Re: [EPEL-devel] Fwd: [Fedora-packaging] %license for EPEL6

On 17 March 2015 at 20:08, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:34:10 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: This was on the packaging list but effects EPEL. Any suggestions? -- Forwarded message -- From: Thomas Moschny

Re: EPEL guacd package broken

Hello, I'm going to fix this ASAP. Had a busy week and catched up with mails just now. Please leave some karma feedback after testing. BTW, this list is not the correct place to post this kind of requests, please open a bug on the selected component. Regards, --Simone On 9 October 2014 01:00,

Re: EPEL quick epel7 update

Hello, thanks for your answers. On 17 June 2014 00:59, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote: By using CentOS as the basis and not RHEL 7 we could have all the channels that are not used at the moment for building. As much as I'd like to see CentOS as the basis for *everything* (I may be

Re: EPEL quick epel7 update

On 17 June 2014 16:07, Jeff Sheltren j...@tag1consulting.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Aren't we already using CentOS for EPEL 5 and 6 in the koji/mock buildroots? 32 bit aside, what is the difference for 7? This has been dealt

Re: EPEL Maintaining libntlm for ppc64

On 4 June 2014 18:18, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:47:27AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: We might want to hold off on limited arch packages until rhel7 is actually released... since we don't really know whats in the final set until it's there. Unless RHEL

Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji

On 2 June 2014 16:46, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I was looking to build a package on epel7 that is relying on jansson-devel. The -devel subpackage is generated as normally from

Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji

On 3 June 2014 11:29, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: You can file a bug with RHEL rel-eng here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Red%20Hat%20Enterprise%20Linux%207component=relengversion=7.0 Of course, supporting Workstation in general would be very

EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji

Hello, I was looking to build a package on epel7 that is relying on jansson-devel. The -devel subpackage is generated as normally from the main jansson package, but in case of epel7 the resulting rpm is included in the Workstation-optional channel:

Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji

On 2 June 2014 11:04, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: EPEL builds against the Server + Server-optional variant of RHEL - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=258 Is this the final setup of EPEL for RHEL 7 that will be available for all the time the distribution is supported by

Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji

On 2 June 2014 11:09, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 June 2014 11:04, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: EPEL builds against the Server + Server-optional variant of RHEL - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=258 Is this the final setup of EPEL for RHEL 7

EPEL texlive in 7

Hello, is there any plan to have texlive in EPEL 7? I need it but wouldn't dare asking for the branch myself... looks complicated and I don't have any direct experience with it. Thanks regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore

Re: EPEL texlive in 7

On 1 April 2014 12:58, Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Uhm, so this is just about a virtual Provides? TeXLive *does* have latex. Just install texlive-latex. Ok, I confirm is related to the texlive version in RHEL 7. I reworked all the BuildRequires in the SPEC file with

Re: EPEL texlive in 7

On 1 April 2014 13:55, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: On 1 April 2014 12:58, Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.orgwrote: Uhm, so this is just about a virtual Provides? TeXLive *does* have latex. Just install texlive-latex. Ok, I confirm is related to the texlive version

EPEL 7 i686 libraries

Hello, maybe I missed this, but I would like to know what's the status of EPEL 7 32 bit (i686) support. I see that in Koji all libraries are x86_64 or ppc64. Shouldn't we have i686 libraries as well, much like in Fedora? Also considering that the system itself has many 32 bit libraries:

EPEL Updating NDOUtils to 1.5.2

Hello, I would like to update the current NDOUtils 1.4b9 (2009-10-27) to the latest 1.5.2 (2012-06-08) in both epel 5 and 6. The former maintainer was not using the package, no one volunteered for it so it was retired in Fedora in 2012. As it could not be retired from released branches, this is