On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:37 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> Or have a "purgatory" repo where packages retired in EL 8.2 get to live
> until, say, a month after CentOS 8.2 is GA? Again, seems like too much work.
>
Or, perhaps we could archive things before a release.
I guess my reply got
On 5/14/20 4:59 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's an ongoing problem. EPEL's decision to show only the most recent
versions of RPMs, and to trim old RPMs out, is a destabilizing problem
and why I make hrdlinked snapshots of EPEL using "rsnapshot" for
internal access to old packages.
So
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 09:06, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:02 AM Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 20:00, Nico Kadel-Garcia
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:32 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 20:00, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:32 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're working on validating CentOS 8 for some desktop use cases at work,
> > and noticed that after working fine on a machine that's installed
> > several
On 5/14/20 1:03 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:32 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/zstd/history/dead.package?identifier=epel8
The package is only in BaseOS in 8.2 though, and CentOS 8.2 is not out
-- the only repo that has it now is
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:32 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We're working on validating CentOS 8 for some desktop use cases at work,
> and noticed that after working fine on a machine that's installed
> several months ago, it's now failing on a freshly-installed machine.
>
> Turns
