On 01. 05. 20 21:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'd like to look at seeing if we can accomplish what we wanted with
playground by having it just inherit from epel8.
As a drive-by epel contributor, this would work so much better for me.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On 5/1/20 12:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There was no 'rule' but the intent was everyone would keep the
package.cfg and build for both. If they were not making any playground
changes, they didn't need to commit anything, and fedpkg build would
just build for both epel8 and epel8-playground.
The
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:48:54AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
>
> On 5/1/20 1:10 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do
> > > we
> > > expect
On 5/1/20 1:10 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do we
expect every package in EPEL8 to also be built for EPEL8-playground, either
through package.cfg or by
