[EPEL-devel] Re: modular bugzilla components

2021-08-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 09:44:12PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24. 08. 21 3:40, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Should I create an epel8 branch but then retire it just to create a
> > bugzilla component?
> 
> AFAIK this wont work. Packages retired on EPEL have the components blocked.

Right. 

Instead we need to tech our bugzilla sync to sync EPEL modules to
'Fedora EPEL Modules/$name' like our Fedora modules are made under
'Fedora Modules/$name'.

I've filed: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/toddlers/issue/82
about this. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[EPEL-devel] Re: modular bugzilla components

2021-08-24 Thread Miro Hrončok

On 24. 08. 21 3:40, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Should I create an epel8 branch but then retire it just to create a bugzilla 
component?


AFAIK this wont work. Packages retired on EPEL have the components blocked.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[EPEL-devel] Re: modular bugzilla components

2021-08-24 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 9:22 AM Troy Dawson  wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 6:41 PM Orion Poplawski  wrote:
>>
>> The "zabbix" package exists in EPEL8 in two forms:
>>
>> zabbix40 - non-module 4.0 package.
>> zabbix - module with 5.0 stream.
>>
>> Because the "zabbix" dist-git does not have a epel8 branch, there is no
>> "zabbix" component in bugzilla for EPEL8.  Should I create an epel8
>> branch but then retire it just to create a bugzilla component?  Or
>> something else?
>
>
> My opinion, yes.
> This does two things.
> 1 - creates an EPEL zabbix bugzilla component
> 2 - creates a dead.package file in the dist-git branch, that if people read, 
> will point them to the right place.
>
> But that is my opinion.  If others know of a good way to get a bugzilla 
> component in, there might be better ways.

That seems rather complicated.  Perhaps Ben could just add the
component to the EPEL product in bugzilla directly.

Ben, can you do this via the Program Management interfaces?

josh
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[EPEL-devel] Re: modular bugzilla components

2021-08-24 Thread Troy Dawson
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 6:41 PM Orion Poplawski  wrote:

> The "zabbix" package exists in EPEL8 in two forms:
>
> zabbix40 - non-module 4.0 package.
> zabbix - module with 5.0 stream.
>
> Because the "zabbix" dist-git does not have a epel8 branch, there is no
> "zabbix" component in bugzilla for EPEL8.  Should I create an epel8
> branch but then retire it just to create a bugzilla component?  Or
> something else?
>

My opinion, yes.
This does two things.
1 - creates an EPEL zabbix bugzilla component
2 - creates a dead.package file in the dist-git branch, that if people
read, will point them to the right place.

But that is my opinion.  If others know of a good way to get a bugzilla
component in, there might be better ways.

Troy
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure