On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "KD" == Ken Dreyer writes:
>
> KD> I've always thought it's the other way around, that EPEL moves
> KD> faster than RHEL,
>
> Well, what I said didn't contradict that, so... I guess I don't
> understand what you're trying to
On 18 July 2018 at 14:19, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:36 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
> wrote:
>>> "RI" == Roman Iuvshyn writes:
>>
>> Maintainers are generally going to be very reluctant to update a package
>> in EPEL without some pressing need. Not generally as reluctant
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:36 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "RI" == Roman Iuvshyn writes:
>
> Maintainers are generally going to be very reluctant to update a package
> in EPEL without some pressing need. Not generally as reluctant as Red Hat
> would
> be for a package in RHEL7 proper
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 6:36 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> > "RI" == Roman Iuvshyn writes:
>
> RI> I have a question related to *python2-jenkins-job-builder
> RI> *package, who maintains this?
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-jenkins-job-builder shows all
> of the
> "RI" == Roman Iuvshyn writes:
RI> I have a question related to *python2-jenkins-job-builder
RI> *package, who maintains this?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-jenkins-job-builder shows all
of the maintainers.
RI> currently available version in epel is pretty old and I wonder if