On 08/01/2017 01:05 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I will bring this up at the meeting tomorrow, but I believe that the
plan would be something like the following:
1. "Update" the current package with README.deprecated explaining why
the package is being removed from the repository and
packages can be blocked from being forked in EPEL. I don't remember if that
is koji or some other higher end tool.
On 3 August 2017 at 18:09, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> > Does the above sound
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> Does the above sound reasonable ?
>
Sounds great.
It leads me to ask a question I've been wondering about for a while
w.r.t retiring Ceph from EPEL 7: How can we keep other random
contributors from re-introducing
On 08/01/2017 10:05 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 1 August 2017 at 12:32, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
>> Building 12.1.1 for EPEL7 would be VERY bad IMNSHO. 0.80.7 _is_ seriously
>> out of date, but:
>>
>> 1) You can't upgrade directly from 0.80.7 to 12.1.1 without upgrading
On 08/01/2017 10:05 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I will bring this up at the meeting tomorrow, but I believe that the
> plan would be something like the following:
>
> 1. "Update" the current package with README.deprecated explaining why
> the package is being removed from the repository
On 3 August 2017 at 15:00, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 08/01/2017 01:05 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 1 August 2017 at 12:32, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us>> wrote:
>>
>> Building 12.1.1 for EPEL7 would be VERY bad IMNSHO. 0.80.7
On 08/01/2017 01:05 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 1 August 2017 at 12:32, Jeffrey Ollie > wrote:
Building 12.1.1 for EPEL7 would be VERY bad IMNSHO. 0.80.7 _is_
seriously out of date, but:
[snip]
I will bring this up at the meeting
On 08/01/2017 01:05 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I will bring this up at the meeting tomorrow, but I believe that the
plan would be something like the following:
1. "Update" the current package with README.deprecated explaining why
the package is being removed from the repository and
On 1 August 2017 at 12:32, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> Building 12.1.1 for EPEL7 would be VERY bad IMNSHO. 0.80.7 _is_ seriously
> out of date, but:
>
> 1) You can't upgrade directly from 0.80.7 to 12.1.1 without upgrading to
> at least 0.94.X and then 10.2.X first, and there are
Building 12.1.1 for EPEL7 would be VERY bad IMNSHO. 0.80.7 _is_ seriously
out of date, but:
1) You can't upgrade directly from 0.80.7 to 12.1.1 without upgrading to at
least 0.94.X and then 10.2.X first, and there are probably other
intermediate steps as well (you'd have to dig through the
10 matches
Mail list logo