Re: [EPEL-devel] cmake and cmake28 in RHEL 6?

2015-05-19 Thread Dave Johansen
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Orion Poplawski 
wrote:

> On 05/15/2015 10:57 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Orion Poplawski > > wrote:
>>
>> On 04/21/2015 08:48 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Orion Poplawski
>> mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>>  On 04/20/2015 09:32 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>>
>>  I just noticed that the version of cmake that comes
>> with RHEL 6 is
>>  currently 2.8.12.2 and the EPEL has a cmake28 package
>> that is at
>>  version
>>  2.8.11.2. I believe that RHEL 6 originally shipped with
>> cmake
>>  2.6 and
>>  updated in a later point release, but I have two
>> questions:
>>  1) Is the cmake28 a duplicate and need to be removed?
>>
>>
>>  Yes.
>>
>>
>> Ok. Is this already being worked on? Or does a bugzilla need to be
>> created for it?
>>
>>
>> A quick search:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=%3Acmake28&list_id=3417355
>>
>> turns up: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159351
>>
>> There is some question as to whether or not it is worth the pain to
>> retire.  I suppose you could also consider it pulling things away
>> from EPEL users.  If it is kept, it probably should be updated at
>> least.
>>
>>
>> Would it be possible to create a Bugzilla and request that a virtual
>> provide for cmake28 be added to the cmake package in RHEL? I believe
>> that would allow the package in EPEL to be retired without requiring
>> changes to existing .spec files. I'm guessing that a cmake28 symlink
>> might be needed as well, but it still seems possible and a solution that
>> shouldn't have too much headache.
>>
>
> Sure, anything is possible :).   Although I don't see what the big deal
> about changing the EPEL packages would be.   If anything, it would just
> bring them back in line with the Fedora branches.
>

My concern would just be the added effort of maintaining both of them and
it falling behind like has already happened here.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: [EPEL-devel] cmake and cmake28 in RHEL 6?

2015-05-16 Thread Orion Poplawski

On 05/15/2015 10:57 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Orion Poplawski mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com>> wrote:

On 04/21/2015 08:48 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Orion Poplawski
mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com>
>> wrote:

 On 04/20/2015 09:32 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:

 I just noticed that the version of cmake that comes
with RHEL 6 is
 currently 2.8.12.2 and the EPEL has a cmake28 package
that is at
 version
 2.8.11.2. I believe that RHEL 6 originally shipped with
cmake
 2.6 and
 updated in a later point release, but I have two questions:
 1) Is the cmake28 a duplicate and need to be removed?


 Yes.


Ok. Is this already being worked on? Or does a bugzilla need to be
created for it?


A quick search:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=%3Acmake28&list_id=3417355

turns up: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159351

There is some question as to whether or not it is worth the pain to
retire.  I suppose you could also consider it pulling things away
from EPEL users.  If it is kept, it probably should be updated at least.


Would it be possible to create a Bugzilla and request that a virtual
provide for cmake28 be added to the cmake package in RHEL? I believe
that would allow the package in EPEL to be retired without requiring
changes to existing .spec files. I'm guessing that a cmake28 symlink
might be needed as well, but it still seems possible and a solution that
shouldn't have too much headache.


Sure, anything is possible :).   Although I don't see what the big deal 
about changing the EPEL packages would be.   If anything, it would just 
bring them back in line with the Fedora branches.



--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane  or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301  http://www.cora.nwra.com
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: [EPEL-devel] cmake and cmake28 in RHEL 6?

2015-05-15 Thread Dave Johansen
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Orion Poplawski 
wrote:

> On 04/21/2015 08:48 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Orion Poplawski > > wrote:
>>
>> On 04/20/2015 09:32 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>>
>> I just noticed that the version of cmake that comes with RHEL 6 is
>> currently 2.8.12.2 and the EPEL has a cmake28 package that is at
>> version
>> 2.8.11.2. I believe that RHEL 6 originally shipped with cmake
>> 2.6 and
>> updated in a later point release, but I have two questions:
>> 1) Is the cmake28 a duplicate and need to be removed?
>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>
>> Ok. Is this already being worked on? Or does a bugzilla need to be
>> created for it?
>>
>
> A quick search:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=%3Acmake28&list_id=3417355
>
> turns up:  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159351
>
> There is some question as to whether or not it is worth the pain to
> retire.  I suppose you could also consider it pulling things away from EPEL
> users.  If it is kept, it probably should be updated at least.
>

Would it be possible to create a Bugzilla and request that a virtual
provide for cmake28 be added to the cmake package in RHEL? I believe that
would allow the package in EPEL to be retired without requiring changes to
existing .spec files. I'm guessing that a cmake28 symlink might be needed
as well, but it still seems possible and a solution that shouldn't have too
much headache.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: [EPEL-devel] cmake and cmake28 in RHEL 6?

2015-04-21 Thread Orion Poplawski

On 04/21/2015 08:48 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Orion Poplawski mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com>> wrote:

On 04/20/2015 09:32 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:

I just noticed that the version of cmake that comes with RHEL 6 is
currently 2.8.12.2 and the EPEL has a cmake28 package that is at
version
2.8.11.2. I believe that RHEL 6 originally shipped with cmake
2.6 and
updated in a later point release, but I have two questions:
1) Is the cmake28 a duplicate and need to be removed?


Yes.


Ok. Is this already being worked on? Or does a bugzilla need to be
created for it?


A quick search: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=%3Acmake28&list_id=3417355


turns up:  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159351

There is some question as to whether or not it is worth the pain to 
retire.  I suppose you could also consider it pulling things away from 
EPEL users.  If it is kept, it probably should be updated at least.



--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane  or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301  http://www.cora.nwra.com
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: [EPEL-devel] cmake and cmake28 in RHEL 6?

2015-04-21 Thread Dave Johansen
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Orion Poplawski 
wrote:

> On 04/20/2015 09:32 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
>> I just noticed that the version of cmake that comes with RHEL 6 is
>> currently 2.8.12.2 and the EPEL has a cmake28 package that is at version
>> 2.8.11.2. I believe that RHEL 6 originally shipped with cmake 2.6 and
>> updated in a later point release, but I have two questions:
>> 1) Is the cmake28 a duplicate and need to be removed?
>>
>
> Yes.
>

Ok. Is this already being worked on? Or does a bugzilla need to be created
for it?

 2) I'm working on packaging cppformat and on RHEL 6 when I build with
>> cmake28 everything works out of the box, but with cmake I have to add
>> -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=OFF to get the linker to work properly?
>>
>> Is #2 an error/incorrect assumption in the cmake setup for cppformat? Or
>> is it something wrong in the "system cmake" that is correct in cmake28?
>>
>
> It's a (longstanding) bug in the RHEL cmake package:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640672
>

Thanks for the heads up. I'll just leave the flag in there for now.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: [EPEL-devel] cmake and cmake28 in RHEL 6?

2015-04-20 Thread Orion Poplawski

On 04/20/2015 09:32 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:

I just noticed that the version of cmake that comes with RHEL 6 is
currently 2.8.12.2 and the EPEL has a cmake28 package that is at version
2.8.11.2. I believe that RHEL 6 originally shipped with cmake 2.6 and
updated in a later point release, but I have two questions:
1) Is the cmake28 a duplicate and need to be removed?


Yes.


2) I'm working on packaging cppformat and on RHEL 6 when I build with
cmake28 everything works out of the box, but with cmake I have to add
-DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=OFF to get the linker to work properly?

Is #2 an error/incorrect assumption in the cmake setup for cppformat? Or
is it something wrong in the "system cmake" that is correct in cmake28?


It's a (longstanding) bug in the RHEL cmake package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640672



Thanks,
Dave


___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel




--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane  or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301  http://www.cora.nwra.com
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


[EPEL-devel] cmake and cmake28 in RHEL 6?

2015-04-20 Thread Dave Johansen
I just noticed that the version of cmake that comes with RHEL 6 is
currently 2.8.12.2 and the EPEL has a cmake28 package that is at version
2.8.11.2. I believe that RHEL 6 originally shipped with cmake 2.6 and
updated in a later point release, but I have two questions:
1) Is the cmake28 a duplicate and need to be removed?
2) I'm working on packaging cppformat and on RHEL 6 when I build with
cmake28 everything works out of the box, but with cmake I have to add
-DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=OFF to get the linker to work properly?

Is #2 an error/incorrect assumption in the cmake setup for cppformat? Or is
it something wrong in the "system cmake" that is correct in cmake28?

Thanks,
Dave
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel