On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
The macros.epel file is missing?
kevin
Looks like it didn't make it in the latest patch, but here it is from the
first patch:
--
diff --git a/macros.epel b/macros.epel
new file mode 100644
index 000..fb4413f
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:00:18 -0600
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
OK (attached).
The macros.epel file is missing?
kevin
pgpwyHWUBWXXS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Rex Dieter
rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
+%epel %{?rhel}%{!?:rhel:7}
typo alert ^^ (in the second part), but hopefully you get the idea.
Or, if you'd rather not depend on %rhel macro, and just hard-code to 7,
that
Rex Dieter wrote:
I'd like to be able to conditionalize some package features depending on
if
epel repo is enabled or not. One way to accomplish that goal is if epel-
release defined some macro, say, something like %{epel}, similar to
%{feodra} or %{rhel}
(I don't care what the macro is
Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote on Oct 16:
I'd like to be able to conditionalize some package features depending on
if
epel repo is enabled or not. One way to accomplish that goal is if epel-
release defined some macro, say, something like %{epel}, similar to
%{feodra} or %{rhel}
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
+%epel %{?rhel}%{!?:rhel:7}
typo alert ^^ (in the second part), but hopefully you get the idea.
Or, if you'd rather not depend on %rhel macro, and just hard-code to 7,
that
would be fine too.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:56:35PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rex Dieter
rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
ping, any comment or objection?
I'll work on a patch for epel-release to implement a %{epel} macro, in
case anyone was waiting
Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:56:35PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rex Dieter
rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
ping, any comment or objection?
I'll work on a patch for epel-release to implement a %{epel} macro, in
Rex Dieter wrote on Oct 16:
I'd like to be able to conditionalize some package features depending on
if
epel repo is enabled or not. One way to accomplish that goal is if epel-
release defined some macro, say, something like %{epel}, similar to
%{feodra} or %{rhel}
(I don't care what the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
ping, any comment or objection?
I'll work on a patch for epel-release to implement a %{epel} macro, in case
anyone was waiting for implementation details.
Seems like it can't hurt much to have such a macro defined by
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rex Dieter
rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
ping, any comment or objection?
I'll work on a patch for epel-release to implement a %{epel} macro, in
case anyone was waiting for implementation details.
Seems like it can't hurt much to have
11 matches
Mail list logo
