Re: EPEL Missing perl-Net-IP

2013-06-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:20:21 + Finnur Örn Guðmundsson finnur.gudmunds...@islandsbanki.is wrote: Hi all, Not sure if this should go here or to the epel-users list but here goes Just tried to install munin-node on a new RHEL6 machine and got this error: Error: Package:

Re: EPEL Access to devtoolset in ?

2013-09-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:32:41 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote: How can I get involved in that process? I would definitely like to help out with enabling the support for them in the EPEL. Join the packaging list and see this post just today:

Re: EPEL Access to devtoolset in ?

2013-09-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Some questions for you: - Is the source available for anyone to download/use? I can't seem to see it off hand on ftp.redhat.com. - How do you propose handing the difference in lifecycle? SCL is saying 3 years next to RHEL's 10. What happens at those points? Everyone breaks and needs to

Re: EPEL Need help regarding of a broken dependency notification

2013-09-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:08:23 -0500 Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com wrote: perl-libintl provides perl(Locale::Recode) Why? I don't know. Doesn't seem to follow the normal perl naming convention. Anyway, it looks like this was put into EPEL5, but never EPEL6.

Re: EPEL Updating ODB in ?

2013-12-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:45:44 +0400 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All! 2013/12/2 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com: I recently submitted ODB 2.2 to the EPEL for EL 5/6 and version 2.3 has been released (

Re: EPEL 7?

2013-12-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
It's not at all too soon, and I was/am planning on writing up a more detailed email on it very soon. Look for that in the next few days... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

EPEL epel7 planning and processes

2013-12-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. Several folks have been asking about epel7 and we should get the ball rolling now that there is a public rhel7 beta. I'd like to propose a similar plan to the one we used for epel6, which the possible exception of branching method. For epel6 we asked maintainers who didn't want to

Re: EPEL epel7 planning and processes

2013-12-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 12:03:47 +0100 Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, Dne pátek, 13. prosince 2013 17:42:24 CEST, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:36:48 -0700 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: ... Yeah, opt-in sounds like a much better idea

Re: EPEL epel7 planning and processes

2013-12-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:53:19 -0800 Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote: What's the process opt-in at this point? I'm a bit unclear. I see that epel-release was built for EPEL7 (and that the git branch is epel7 instead of el7). There's no process yet because we don't have some things

Re: EPEL Should I request epel7 branch in packaging?

2014-01-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 23:29:49 +0800 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I wonder if I need to add epel7 to the branch list or the system will do for me? I want to package for epel7 also. When we are ready for branches we will announce and that will include the process and what

Re: EPEL Python 3 for 7?

2014-01-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:32:18 -0500 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: Perhaps this would be a good time to reopen the conversation of minor-release policy changes? Sure. RHEL releases approximately every six months with a minor release. It seems fair to allow major EPEL upgrades

Re: EPEL Python 3 for 7?

2014-01-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:00:58 -0500 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: My thoughts are these (in no particular order). * Treat this branch like Rawhide. All builds targeted at this are composed to a repo. Signing is nice, but not mandatory in my opinion. It's pretty much impossible

Re: EPEL Issue with koji?

2014-02-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:54:07 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to do a build on koji and ran into an error during the mock buildroot setup ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6488038 ). I posted previously on the Fedora devel mailing list but

Re: EPEL Issue with koji?

2014-02-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:28:24 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote: Doh! The original email in this chain was a copy and paste/stupid user error on my part. No, I no longer get that issue with the llvm build and like Kevin pointed out, just waiting worked. But I sent two emails

Re: EPEL 7 branch requests

2014-02-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:10:10 +0100 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net wrote: Hello everyone, are the EPEL7 branch requests on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7/Requests still being processed or are we back to the standard branch requests in the original review

Re: EPEL Project collaboration and supplementary arch support

2014-03-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 05:54:43 -0500 Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote: In preparation for the launch of EL7 and due to community demand, the CentOS Project will be providing additional arch support not included in RHEL. Specifically we intend to continue producing for the i686 architecture,

Re: EPEL Project collaboration and supplementary arch support

2014-03-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:40:42 +0100 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: as a contributor I would really like to have i686 as one of the main architectures. With the current situation, there's no chance to rebuild many of the packages that could benefit of RHEL 7 multilib support. RHEL 7

Re: EPEL EPIC! [was Re: and SCL]

2014-03-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:25:50 +0400 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-03-21 16:07 GMT+04:00 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org: It doesn't exist, it's an idea that Robyn has floated semi-seriously as a way to provide a repo that moves faster than EPEL. Rather than try to

Re: EPEL Expirience with Free RHEL-Entitlement for Developers

2014-03-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:15:35 +0100 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote: Hello, I would like, if anyoune have tried to get an Free RHEL Entitlement for EPEL Developers in the last few months and tell my anything about how long the processing time have taken. I have tried it in

Re: EPEL Concerning request for libupnp addition

2014-03-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 08:34:11 -0400 Aaron W. Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote: I submitted a package request a few days ago for libupnp in the EPEL 7 Beta repository. I notice that other packages have made it into the repository, but the libupnp library has not. I presume there was a reason for

Re: EPEL Concerning request for libupnp addition

2014-03-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:06:08 -0400 Aaron W. Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote: On Sat, 2014-03-29 at 09:22 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 08:34:11 -0400 Aaron W. Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote: I submitted a package request a few days ago for libupnp in the EPEL 7 Beta

Re: EPEL Python 3.4 for 7

2014-04-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:49:04 -0600 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: So, we're just about ready to have python3-3.4 built in rawhide. This package builds fine in EPEL7 too. So, I'm proposing to build (and hopefully with help from others) maintain python3-3.4 for EPEL. Other

Re: EPEL [pkgdb] python-augeas epel7 cloned from EL-6

2014-04-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:46:37 -0500 Greg Swift gregsw...@gmail.com wrote: sorry that got sent prematurely. Here is the full version: hey all. So I was talking to Dominic Cleal this week at the Summit and he pointed out that python-augeas is getting pulled into RHEL 7 proper. Its not in the

Re: EPEL epel beta report: 20140427 changes

2014-04-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 09:31:01 + EPEL Beta Report e...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Compose started at Sun Apr 27 08:15:03 UTC 2014 FYI, ,composes are failing due to a conflict between two packages. :( Will dig into it more tomorrow... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: EPEL epel beta report: 20140427 changes

2014-04-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:34:32 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 09:31:01 + EPEL Beta Report e...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Compose started at Sun Apr 27 08:15:03 UTC 2014 FYI, ,composes are failing due to a conflict between two packages. :( Will dig

Re: EPEL RFC: Strategy for python3 versions

2014-04-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:54:31 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: ...snip... What do people think? Is this something we can do within the policies of EPEL? Does it make sense to go forward with this? Is it better to go with one of the alternatives? ...snip... I like the plan.

Re: EPEL thoughts or views on packages deliberately left out of rhel?

2014-05-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 1 May 2014 23:52:34 +0200 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net wrote: On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 15:02, Jim Perrin wrote: ...snip... [snip - about kmail] I guess I have two specific questions for this. 1. Can epel track and provide the same source versions

Re: EPEL Delay in processing requests

2014-05-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:43:54 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: It was pointed out in IRC that the list of packages at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7/Requests was getting rather long. The problem currently is that we have moved to a package database and the existing

Re: EPEL EL5 PPC koji builder repo broken?

2014-06-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:08:59 +0200 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at wrote: On 06/04/2014 09:29 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: The EL5 PPC koji builder seems to be unable to find at least some packages at the moment:

Re: EPEL Maintaining libntlm for ppc64

2014-06-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:26:55 +0200 Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: Hi, libntlm is not available for ppc in RHEL7 and it is a dependency for a package I would like to build for EPEL7. Therefore I intend to create a package according to

EPEL quick epel7 update

2014-06-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Just a quick update: * I am working to get the final rhel7 content lined up for building against in koji, as soon as that goes live I'll drop a note here. * When do we want to look at leaving beta status for epel7? I'd suggest we should definitely give CentOS time to release, but should we

Re: EPEL quick epel7 update

2014-06-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:12:57 +0200 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Another thing, there are packages that are spread into multiple upstream optional channels that make it impossible to include some packages in the distribution. One thread here:

Re: EPEL quick epel7 update

2014-06-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:14:55 +0200 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Mock is using CentOS: $ pwd /var/cache/mock/epel-6-x86_64/yum_cache/updates/packages $ ls -al *centos* -rw-rw-r--. 1 root mock 20960 May 20 15:33 centos-release-6-5.el6.centos.11.2.x86_64.rpm -rw-rw-r--. 1

Re: EPEL rhel-extras

2014-06-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
ok, not much discussion here, but it seems like everyone is ok with just saying rhel-extras is something we don't conflict with. Thanks, kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

EPEL rhel7 final content

2014-06-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
We've switched over to using the final rhel7 content finally. Sorry for the delay. As you can see from the epel7 build tag in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=259 we have the following rhel7 channels that we are building against and will not conflict with:

Re: EPEL rhel7 final content

2014-06-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:23:24 -0700 Jeff Sheltren j...@tag1consulting.com wrote: Awesome, thanks! Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7 builds into the normal git/koji/bodhi workflow? Is that waiting on a CentOS release, or are there other issues? Well, at least centos release... but

Re: EPEL rhel7 final content

2014-06-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:41:32 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 June 2014 09:28, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:23:24 -0700 Jeff Sheltren j...@tag1consulting.com wrote: Awesome, thanks! Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7

Re: EPEL several yum priorities exclusions in el6 noticed

2014-06-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:01:26 -0500 Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote: During some of the testing for centos7 (and in the process cleaning up some things for c6 as well), we noticed that there are a number of packages that are excluded from epel when using the priorities plugin with yum.

EPEL leaving beta...

2014-07-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
With the release of CentOS7 today and based on no one chiming in with other things we need to wait for, I guess we should look at leaving beta. :) Things we need to do: * Untag all packages that have broken deps and notify maintainers. * Check for overlapping packages and untag any needed.

Re: EPEL Branch issues with libgeotiff

2014-07-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 21:51:43 +0300 Devrim Gündüz fedora-l...@gunduz.org wrote: Hi, Recently, I asked for epel7 branch of libgeotiff twice -- That is the final dependency towards pushing gdal to EPEL 7, so I can push PostGIS. However, even though it seems that the requests have been

Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.

2014-07-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
The set of Xfce packages is Not yet finished for epel7. It's a work in progress. nonamed...@fedoraproject.org is heading up the effort. So, yes, it's expected that things are not fully working yet, it's still being worked on. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.

2014-07-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 21:24:20 -0500 nonamedotc nonamed...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/15/2014 10:02 AM, Martin Sourada wrote: If I recall correctly (it's been a while since I last touched this package), the -gnome and -compat packages are used

Re: EPEL 7 broken deps and beta status update

2014-07-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:57:47 +1000 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com wrote: Excerpts from Kevin Fenzi's message of 2014-07-20 03:08:03 +1000: TurboGears-1.1.3-8.el7.src.rpm I have an open ticket to unblock the missing deps for this... hopefully rel-eng will have a chance to take care of

Re: EPEL testing-epel7 : availability date

2014-08-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 11:54:58 -0700 Mark Sieklucki mark.sieklu...@marksieklucki.com wrote: Is there any update on when EPEL 7 is going to leave beta? Last post I found about this is over a month old and basically says we should plan on leaving beta but doesn't give any further details:

Re: EPEL Notes from .next discussion.

2014-08-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:05:07 +0200 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: At FLOCK this year, I did a short workshop on what was labeled EPEL.Next. At that we went over a bit of what EPEL has done in the past, what its current challenges are, and what could be its future. Toshio

Re: EPEL Proposed meeting: Fri Aug 22 16:00:00 UTC 2014

2014-08-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:51:04 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: I am proposing that the EPEL community hold a meeting in #epel on Friday August 22, 2014 16:00:00 UTC to go over various community items: Sure. I will be there. :) Thanks for trying to organize things again.

Re: EPEL Proposed meeting: Fri Aug 22 16:00:00 UTC 2014

2014-08-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:52:53 +0200 Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 05:51:04PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I am proposing that the EPEL community hold a meeting in #epel on Friday August 22, 2014 16:00:00 UTC to go over various community items:

EPEL epel7 packages with broken deps

2014-08-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Here's a list of the packages we untagged while moving out of beta. Please make sure the deps are all satisfied on these before pushing them into epel7. Thanks, kevin -- php-phpseclib-net-sftp-0.3.5-2.el7.src.rpm caja-extensions-1.8.0-1.el7.src.rpm nodejs-express-3.5.2-1.el7.src.rpm

EPEL -ANNOUNCE epel7 release

2014-08-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. Today, EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) is happy to announce that epel-7 is leaving it's Beta phase and is entering release. epel-7 contains over 3100 high quality source packages, building over 5600 rpms. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL For more

Re: EPEL EPIC minor release branches

2014-09-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 03:45:12 -0400 (EDT) Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I read the log from last weeks EPEL meeting [1]. It is great to see discuss happening on (codename:) EPIC. :-) At Flock at the EPEL.next session there was mention of using branches/tags per minor EL

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:20:19 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: So this is my general proposal for per point release. Problem trying to be solved: EPEL's original goal around a 5-7 year product has run into issues where various packages end up having shorter lifetimes

Re: EPEL Cloud-init in -7

2014-09-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 19:07:57 +0100 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: On 09/09/2014 04:50 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: Alternatively, is cloud-init an actual shipped RH package that should be excluded/blacklisted from epel? its certainly used in the RHEL image Odd. I am not seeing

Re: EPEL Repoclosure problems for -6

2014-09-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:09:05 -0600 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: This has always been a funny one, and I've brought it up in the past, in the x86_64 repo: package: grib_api-devel-1.12.3-1.el6.i686 from epelx unresolved deps: gcc-gfortran(x86-32) Apparently there is

Re: EPEL upgrading mantis

2014-10-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:46:48 +0200 Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, since EPEL 5 ships an ancient version of mantis, I'd like to align it to the 1.2 series used in Fedora and make it easier to keep up with the various security issue fixed upstream. Since it is not really a

Re: EPEL Non-responsive package maintainer (affix)

2014-10-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:30:32 -0700 Brandon Vincent brandon.vinc...@asu.edu wrote: All, Over the past month, I have tried contacting Keiran Smith (affix) in regards to nagios with no success [1]. Is anyone aware to his present status in regards to the Fedora Project or possibly have an

Re: [EPEL-devel] clarification about updates in EPEL

2014-10-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:41:32 -0500 Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@fedoraproject.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi All, I would like some clarification from folks here regarding updating gparted on EPEL-5 and EPEL-6. The version of gparted shipped in EPEl-5

Re: [EPEL-devel] Looking to move Friday EPEL meeting.

2014-10-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:58:14 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: I have had a conflict come up for the Friday meeting at 1600 UTC. Would it be possible to move the meeting to 1700 or 1800 UTC? Either of those times would be fine with me. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [EPEL-devel] peel HTTPS urls don't work in older CentOS

2014-11-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:02:37 +0100 Przemysław Hejman przemyslaw.hej...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, I’ve recently tried to deploy some apps with saltstack on CentOS 6.4. I’m using saltstack bootstrap script, which installs EPEL. The problem is, that yum fails with update because it cannot

Re: [EPEL-devel] peel HTTPS urls don't work in older CentOS

2014-11-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:37:13 +0200 Anssi Johansson e...@miuku.net wrote: I believe the problem is not really SSLv3, but that the Fedora Project uses 4096 bit keys, which the old nss can't handle. I was unable to locate any other web server that used 4096 bit keys when I was diagnosing the

Re: [EPEL-devel] epel-release: consider adding %epel macro ?

2014-11-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:00:18 -0600 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote: OK (attached). The macros.epel file is missing? kevin pgpwyHWUBWXXS.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [EPEL-devel] spice-html5 for EL7

2014-12-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:27:23 +0100 Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, a few weeks ago I contacted jwhite, packager of spice-html5 package for Fedora and EPEL 6 asking a port to EPEL 7. He built the package http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/spice-html5/0.1.5/1.el7/ but

Re: [EPEL-devel] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: spice-html5 for EL7

2014-12-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 08:54:01 -0700 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: On 12/17/2014 08:17 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Can anybody grant him permission? Well, Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado (echevemaster) would be correct person to do it. Not sure if anyone else can. Looks

Re: [EPEL-devel] Current update policy?

2015-03-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:36:41 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote: What is the current update policy for EPEL? The stated one seems to be along the lines of no major changes ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy ) but it seems more like whatever the packager is willing to

Re: [EPEL-devel] Lots of broken dependencies in EPEL 6

2015-03-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:05:28 + Samia, Michel msa...@netsuite.com wrote: Hello Ralph Bean, It looks like your commit [1] broke lots of packages in epel. It caused that python-urllib3 was removed from all EPEL6 mirrors. Unfortunately, lots of packages in EPEL, for example those mentioned

Re: [EPEL-devel] Current update policy?

2015-03-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:00:35 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote: Is that really true? The Qt 5 package in EPEL 6 has been updated several times and I don't recall ever seeing an email/announcement/etc. Were the upgrades incompatible? You have to manually intervene? kevin

Re: [EPEL-devel] building EPEL7 packages against EL7.1?

2015-03-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 03:50:40 -0600 Eric Smith space...@gmail.com wrote: Bug #1203649 was reported against dragonegg, which is tied to the specific version of gcc it is built against, because it uses the gcc plugin interface. EL7.1 has a newer gcc, so dragonegg has to be rebuilt. I did a new

Re: [EPEL-devel] broken PPC64 libxml2-devel?

2015-04-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:38:45 +0100 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: On 01/04/15 16:26, Ken Dreyer wrote: On my PPC64 build of Ceph today [1], I'm seeing this really odd error regarding libxml2-devel: from root.log: ... DEBUG util.py:388: Error: Package:

Re: [EPEL-devel] distribution component in bugzilla

2015-03-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:15:46 -0700 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: Could we get a Distribution component for Fedora EPEL in Bugzilla? Might be useful for things like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197264 Well, we could make such a thing, but not sure it's really

Re: [EPEL-devel] Python 3 discussion

2015-03-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 07:46:00 -0500 (EST) Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote: ^ Is this step part of a coordinated mass-rebuild, or is this just a period of time after we make the announcement: Hey Packagers: be sure to rebuild for python35? That's a good question. I guess we should

Re: [EPEL-devel] Python 3 discussion

2015-03-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 08:31:20 -0500 (EST) Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote: Today, I've made some changes to the proposal to accomodate comments from the previous meeting and from discussion on this list. The diff is here:

Re: [EPEL-devel] Python 3 discussion

2015-03-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:59:29 -0500 (EST) Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - Excerpts from Orion Poplawski's message of 2015-02-28 04:36 +10:00: all python34 packages are retired Except there is no way to retire an individual subpackage, is

Re: [EPEL-devel] broken PPC64 libxml2-devel?

2015-04-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:08:50 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:19:35 -0600 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote: I attempted two new builds, and each failed on ppc64 with the same libxml2-devel error :( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID

Re: [EPEL-devel] Call for Agenda EPEL meeting 2014-04-24

2015-04-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:25:32 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: 1. New Meeting Time? I'm pretty flexable. Perhaps someone could do a whenisgood? 2. New EPEL chair? As I am sure smooge will attest, this is kind of a high burnout thing doing all the meetings and such. So, I'd

Re: [EPEL-devel] po4a problems

2015-05-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 20:11:23 +0100 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: Hi, epel List In bug 1134624 [1] someone asked to build po4a for EPEL 7. I miss some reading and po4a is only need to be build for ppc64 , because in meantime CentOS built it, but only for epel 7 not for 6 and

Re: [EPEL-devel] pkgdb to request epel7 branch, or bugzilla SCM request?

2015-05-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 8 May 2015 09:30:12 -0400 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: I'm confused about the process for requesting an epel7 branch (or any branch for that matter). There is a button in pkgdb to do so, but this documentation still refers to adding an SCM request in bugzilla:

Re: [EPEL-devel] wine 32

2015-05-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 05 May 2015 23:28:47 -0700 ToddAndMargo toddandma...@zoho.com wrote: Hi Kevin and EPEL, Is there any sign of EPEL 7 support for Wine 32 yet? The lack of Wine 32 is keeping me on SL 6.6 and it is starting to drive me nuts! I have 0 idea. ;) I don't maintain wine or use it...

Re: [EPEL-devel] EPSCO is Dead. Long live EPSCO?

2015-04-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:03:05 -0700 Jeff Sheltren j...@tag1consulting.com wrote: According to the initial agreement among interested parties, EPSCO was going to end the first term on March 31st, 2015. Yeah. At the meeting after that point I think everyone agreed to just keep on going? Perhaps

Re: [EPEL-devel] broken PPC64 libxml2-devel?

2015-04-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:29:59 -0600 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: ok. I think I have it fixed. Can you retry your builds ? Thanks, it worked! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9399709 I'm

Re: [EPEL-devel] broken PPC64 libxml2-devel?

2015-04-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 15:19:35 -0600 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote: I attempted two new builds, and each failed on ppc64 with the same libxml2-devel error :( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9395052 is the latest one. What can I try next? ok. This is a deeper

Re: [EPEL-devel] epel7 + vi

2015-05-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:57:07 +0200 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos n...@redhat.com wrote: I'm trying to compile ocserv in epel7 and compilation fails with the following error in mock_build.log: ERROR: dracut-install: ERROR: installing 'vi' dracut-install: ERROR: installing '/etc/virc'

Re: [EPEL-devel] python34 packages for EPEL

2015-07-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:53:30 -0600 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: If you look closely at my diff, you'll see that it doesn't ship a python2 version in epel. But yeah, it may be cleaner to a separate package. It will be a lot of reviews, but hopefully pretty straightforward.

Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL packaging items in RHEL7 workstation

2015-08-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:12:49 -0600 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: EPEL is packaging items that are in RHEL7 workstation because they are not available in the EPEL7 buildroots, e.g.: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234052

Re: [EPEL-devel] epel CD

2015-10-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:13:22 +1300 Peter wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what is the space for 7/x86_64 ? I'm guessing > this would be small enough to fit onto a double-layer DVD. If you > then donk the debug tree from there you could probably fit the rest > onto a

Re: [EPEL-devel] IBM Z Series Binary RPMs

2015-09-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:15:59 -0400 "Bryan Chan" wrote: > > Brian Schonecker wrote on 2015-08-31 09:40:22 AM: > > > I would like to contribute to the Fedora Project EPEL repository by > > compiling the SRPMs located in >

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:58:21 +0200 Haïkel <hgue...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > 2015-09-21 19:46 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com>: > > Which tickets do you mean here? They are only rebuilding some > > packages, but not others or? > > Any tickets filed aga

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:12:07 +0200 Haïkel wrote: > Hi, > > Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about > EPEL's future. Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, > there was little progress on that topic > > After a discussion with a

[EPEL-devel]Re: repoclosure/broken deps for RHEL7.2

2015-12-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
So, I ran some repoclosures today... I think something is still not quite right as I was seeing some broken deps in base rhel repos, which I would think would not be the case. ;( Anyhow, attached it 'epel' which is just rhel + epel and 'epel-testing' which is rhel + epel + epel-testing. kevin

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPSCo weekly meeting

2016-01-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:00:17 -0600 Brian Stinson wrote: > > So, we haven't been meeting too much lately with everyone traveling, > > etc. > > > > Also, Starting in january, FESCo is going to be meeting on Fridays > > at this slot. :) > > > > So, how about we pick another

[EPEL-devel] Re: Error: No Package found for LibRaw-devel

2016-01-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 02:27:31 -0500 (EST) Ding Yi Chen wrote: > When I am building evas-generic-loaders-1.16.0-1.el7.src.rpm, > I see this: > Error: No Package found for LibRaw-devel > > LibRaw-devel for epel7 is retired, but is available in >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Which python3 versions to package for EPEL7?

2016-01-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:41:54 +1000 Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 6 January 2016 at 13:48, Toshio Kuratomi > wrote: > > Despite the confusion, my feeling is that we want the newer > > versions. People who want to run python3 are willing to live more > > on the

[EPEL-devel] Re: New package notification for Fedora EPEL

2015-12-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:07:35 -0700 Orion Poplawski wrote: > I think it would be handy to have new package notification for Fedora > EPEL, e.g. for mediawiki123. I created: > > https://release-monitoring.org/project/8480/ > > I think the next step would be for something to

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPSCo weekly meeting

2015-12-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 05:00:03 + (UTC) den...@ausil.us wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >EPSCo weekly meeting on 2015-12-18 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC >At e...@irc.freenode.net > > The meeting will be about: > > > > Source:

[EPEL-devel]Re: When will 7.2 be in EPEL7 buildroot?

2015-11-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:31:12 -0700 Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 11/18/2015 03:24 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > python-jsonpointer is going into base with 7.2, so it needs to be > > retired from EPEL7[*] > > Before doing that, I wanted to check when will be 7.2

[EPEL-devel]Re: Centos 7, 32 bits edition

2015-11-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:50:31 - zika...@yahoo.com wrote: > Hi everybody > > Now that Fedora 23 is out, do you have some precision for If/when > EPEL packages will be out for Centos 7 32 bits ? Not really. I think the next plan was to look at enabling ppc64le and see how that goes, then take

[EPEL-devel] Re: The "Fedora on EPEL" Package Gap

2016-06-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:49:57 + "Brown, David M JR" wrote: ...snip... Sorry for the delay in replying here, I've had this marked to reply to for a while, but keep getting side tracked. ;) > This presents a problem, I¹ve got three major versions of Torque that > are

[EPEL-devel] EPEL-ANNOUNCE EPEL repoview retirement

2016-05-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. As some have already noticed, we have dropped the repoview files that we used to have along side EPEL files on mirrors. While it was nice to be able to use a browser to look at packages there, we realized that it was causing a massive amount of churn for our mirror network. Every

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL conflicts with Satellite 6 packages

2016-06-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:31:01 -0600 Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote: > There are a number of packages in EPEL 6 and 7 that conflict with > packages provided by either RH Satellite or the katello-agent. > A quick run through for an up to date (6.1.9) install of satellite on

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL build system

2016-06-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:54:13 +0100 Dave Love wrote: > I was reviewing some documentation which includes: > > Redhat for example has a very optimal tool chain which they use for > their Enterprise product line and it is not available to other > distributions (or

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPSCo weekly meeting

2016-01-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:00:03 + (UTC) den...@ausil.us wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >EPSCo weekly meeting on 2016-01-08 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC >At e...@irc.freenode.net > > The meeting will be about: > > > > Source:

[EPEL-devel] New MEETING TIME

2016-01-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:13:12 -0700 Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:00:03 + (UTC) > den...@ausil.us wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >EPSCo weekly meeting on 2016-01-08 fr

  1   2   3   >