On Fri, 8 May 2015 09:30:12 -0400
Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
I'm confused about the process for requesting an epel7 branch (or any
branch for that matter). There is a button in pkgdb to do so, but this
documentation still refers to adding an SCM request in bugzilla:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
176
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
60
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087/dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
60
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
565
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
330
On 05/07/2015 01:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.05.2015 um 21:58 schrieb ToddAndMargo:
Any sign of Red Hat changing their ways? Or are they
just sick and tired of 32 bit?
i686 is dead - there is no RHEL7 for i686 at all
the last non x86_64 i faced was 5 years ago and frankly the whole
On 05/07/2015 01:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.05.2015 um 21:58 schrieb ToddAndMargo:
Any sign of Red Hat changing their ways? Or are they
just sick and tired of 32 bit?
i686 is dead - there is no RHEL7 for i686 at all
Hi Reindl,
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/509373
RHEL
Am 08.05.2015 um 21:09 schrieb ToddAndMargo:
On 05/07/2015 01:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.05.2015 um 21:58 schrieb ToddAndMargo:
Any sign of Red Hat changing their ways? Or are they
just sick and tired of 32 bit?
i686 is dead - there is no RHEL7 for i686 at all
the last non x86_64
On 05/08/2015 08:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.05.2015 um 21:09 schrieb ToddAndMargo:
On 05/07/2015 01:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.05.2015 um 21:58 schrieb ToddAndMargo:
Any sign of Red Hat changing their ways? Or are they
just sick and tired of 32 bit?
i686 is dead - there is
