The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
247 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
229 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
223
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
351 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
113 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
12
On 02/22/2016 09:06 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 19/02/16 15:16, ~Stack~ wrote:
>> Thanks for replying. Makes sense. But what would the harm be to move a
>> package into a separate "retired" repo? Community would know that it
>> isn't maintained and yet the package wouldn't just disappear completely.
>>
On 19/02/16 15:16, ~Stack~ wrote:
> Thanks for replying. Makes sense. But what would the harm be to move a
> package into a separate "retired" repo? Community would know that it
> isn't maintained and yet the package wouldn't just disappear completely.
> I guess the difficult question would then
