[EPEL-devel] Re: Requirements for SRPM names

2016-09-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:54:41 PM CDT Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> I'm looking for some clarification on the naming requirements for >> >> SRPMs. >> >> >> >> In the EPEL 7 in Python 3 Plan Draft [1], it specifies

[EPEL-devel] Re: Requirements for SRPM names

2016-09-14 Thread Paul Howarth
On 14/09/16 03:51, Dennis Gilmore wrote: So, with the limited arch packages this means that _ALL_ things building in koji will use the epel package. The reason for the prepended 0 is so that users don't install the epel package and instead get the newer rhel version. The limited arch guideline

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

2016-09-14 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 826 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 675 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849 sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 318

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2016-09-14 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 434 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 428 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 360

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2016-09-14 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 556 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 318 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 81