[EPEL-devel] Problems with gthumb and exiv2-libs after upgrade to CentOS 7.5 (1804)

2018-05-19 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Hi, Our local school is running a highly customized Xfce desktop based on CentOS 7. We're using quite many EPEL packages. The upgrade from CentOS 7.4 to 7.5 has been a bit bumpy for desktop users. Here's what happens when I try to install the Gthumb image viewer: --> Résolution des

[EPEL-devel] Re: Problems with gthumb and exiv2-libs after upgrade to CentOS 7.5 (1804)

2018-05-19 Thread Todd Zullinger
Hi, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Our local school is running a highly customized Xfce desktop based on > CentOS 7. We're using quite many EPEL packages. > > The upgrade from CentOS 7.4 to 7.5 has been a bit bumpy for desktop > users. Here's what happens when I try to install the Gthumb image viewer:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Problems with gthumb and exiv2-libs after upgrade to CentOS 7.5 (1804)

2018-05-19 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 19/05/2018 à 16:19, Todd Zullinger a écrit : > There's a bug open to resolve this: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1578517 > > The gthumb package just needs to be rebuilt against the > updated exiv libraries. A scratch build succeeds, so this > should be a relatively easy fix and will

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

2018-05-19 Thread Rex Dieter
Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >> Here's a reference to one thread on the topic: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/2014-May/009527.html >> >> and a similar post about requirements: >> http://www.karan.org/blog/2013/12/15/where-is-the-i686-in-rhel-7/ > > Those posts are deprecated

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2018-05-19 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 41 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2c81054303 remctl-3.14-1.el7 16 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-ce811a54c9 roundcubemail-1.1.12-2.el7 13

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

2018-05-19 Thread Rex Dieter
Ken Taylor wrote: > On 05/18/2018 04:47 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Ken Taylor wrote: >> >>> It would be nice if both architectures could be made available in the >>> epel wine package >> I'll say it one more (last) time: epel(*) cannot build i686 packages >> >> (*) In it's current setup. There's

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

2018-05-19 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 05/19/2018 06:17 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Ken Taylor wrote: On 05/18/2018 04:47 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Ken Taylor wrote: It would be nice if both architectures could be made available in the epel wine package I'll say it one more (last) time: epel(*) cannot build i686 packages (*) In it's

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

2018-05-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 07:53:18PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > First, I am not disagreeing with what you are saying. I wrote the > proposal as things that are inside EPEL's circle of influence with > most of the other items going to take a LOT of release engineering > work to accomplish.

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

2018-05-19 Thread Ken Taylor
On 05/19/2018 05:38 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Manuel Wolfshant wrote: Here's a reference to one thread on the topic: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/2014-May/009527.html and a similar post about requirements: http://www.karan.org/blog/2013/12/15/where-is-the-i686-in-rhel-7/

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2018-05-19 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 42 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-5aca1d385d remctl-3.14-1.el6 39 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-dd6e4a3f0b python34-3.4.8-1.el6 13