On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do we
> expect every package in EPEL8 to also be built for EPEL8-playground, either
> through package.cfg or by building directly from the
Le 01/05/2020 à 04:39, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
> Anyone willing to take over ngircd for EPEL?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830182
On a side note : this package is appreciated here.
Last week I published a detailed article about NgIRCd running on CentOS 7.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 08:39:48PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Anyone willing to take over ngircd for EPEL?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830182
Sure. I can do that. Will add it to my list.
kevin
___
epel-devel mailing list --
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:48:54AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
>
> On 5/1/20 1:10 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do
> > > we
> > > expect
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 9:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 04. 20 19:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 14. 04. 20 18:46, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >> Yep, I'm having a hard time finding anything relevant to test.
> >> I have verified it doesn't conflict with any other rpm macro, but I'm
> >> pretty
On 5/1/20 1:10 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do we
expect every package in EPEL8 to also be built for EPEL8-playground, either
through package.cfg or by
On 14. 04. 20 19:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 04. 20 18:46, Troy Dawson wrote:
Yep, I'm having a hard time finding anything relevant to test.
I have verified it doesn't conflict with any other rpm macro, but I'm
pretty sure you had already checked that.
So, I'm giving it a thumbs up.
And I'll
