[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 7 packages that fail to install on RHEL / CentOS / SL 7.8

2020-05-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:11:00AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > I have not created any bugzila's for these yet. I have not checked to > see if these are in -testing already. This is just a list showing > what packages currently do not install from EPEL 7. > > perl-Image-SubImageFind >

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2020-05-05 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2e91626690 php-horde-horde-5.2.22-1.el6 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ed97a34306 qt5-qtbase-5.6.1-6.el6 12

[EPEL-devel] Clarification needed: Conflicts in compat packages

2020-05-05 Thread Miro Hrončok
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Conflicts_in_compat_packages """Due to the EPEL policy of maintaining backwards compatibility, EPEL has a greater need for forward compat packages than Fedora. When creating, a compat package, note that it is okay to set a Conflicts

[EPEL-devel] Re: Clarification needed: Conflicts in compat packages

2020-05-05 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 05. 05. 20 17:48, Troy Dawson wrote: On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:07 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Conflicts_in_compat_packages """Due to the EPEL policy of maintaining backwards compatibility, EPEL has a greater need for forward compat

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 7 packages that fail to install on RHEL / CentOS / SL 7.8

2020-05-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:35:14AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:23 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:11:00AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > I have not created any bugzila's for these yet. I have not checked to > > > see if these are in -testing

[EPEL-devel] Re: Clarification needed: Conflicts in compat packages

2020-05-05 Thread Troy Dawson
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:07 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Conflicts_in_compat_packages > > """Due to the EPEL policy of maintaining backwards compatibility, EPEL has a > greater need for forward compat packages than Fedora. When creating, a

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 7 packages that fail to install on RHEL / CentOS / SL 7.8

2020-05-05 Thread Troy Dawson
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:23 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:11:00AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > I have not created any bugzila's for these yet. I have not checked to > > see if these are in -testing already. This is just a list showing > > what packages currently do not

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 7 packages that fail to install on RHEL / CentOS / SL 7.8

2020-05-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 04:00:28PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:35:14AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:23 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:11:00AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > I have not created any bugzila's for

[EPEL-devel] What to do about python 3.4 in EPEL7?

2020-05-05 Thread Orion Poplawski
This is related to my breaking of various packages by dropping python34-six. Should we: - re-add python34-six - Make an announcement and start removing python34- from EPEL7 starting with: # repoquery --whatrequires python34-six --recursive --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=epel* | sort -u

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2020-05-05 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7f0ce51dbd python-bleach-3.1.4-2.el8 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-72116e7775 chromium-81.0.4044.122-1.el8 11

[EPEL-devel] Re: epel-devel Digest, Vol 85, Issue 7

2020-05-05 Thread Denis Arnaud
Thanks Troy! Most of the packages are mine, and it's because I hadn't pushed the SOCI update to stable yet. I'll fix those packages (which, to the best of my knowledge, are the only ones making use of SOCI (which is indeed the reason why I packaged SOCI in the first place)): airinv airrac airtsp