It is best to open a bugzilla bugs for questions like this.
Each EPEL package is maintained by it's own packager. (Although many
packagers have hundred of packages) And not all packagers are
subscribed to the EPEL mailing list.
In this case, this has already been requested / asked.
Hey Guys,
I just noticed that we are using netdata version 1.26.0, but its missing the
go.d plugin.
Can I do anything to make it included it in the package or is it on purpose
that we are adding that particular plugin.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Ashish Jaiswal
Can you open a bugzilla requesting the %generate_buildrequires macro be
backported to RHEL 8?
Pat
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 12:32 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> I split my time between the latest Fedora and the latest CentOS these
> days, and it would make dogfooding packaging changes for
I split my time between the latest Fedora and the latest CentOS these
days, and it would make dogfooding packaging changes for CentOS/EPEL
much easier if all the packager utilities are available. Right now,
fedpkg is, but fedora-review is not.
Tracking my effort here:
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 12:32 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> I split my time between the latest Fedora and the latest CentOS these
> days, and it would make dogfooding packaging changes for CentOS/EPEL
> much easier if all the packager utilities are available. Right now,
> fedpkg is, but
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Apart from the usual package-not-available story (which I want to fix
as part of my work bringing up the EPEL Packagers SIG), my current
snag is that python-tox-current-env uses %generate_buildrequires which
does not work on CentOS 8:
CentOS 8
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-12-04 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname
On 12/3/20 9:41 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 12:32 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
I split my time between the latest Fedora and the latest CentOS these
days, and it would make dogfooding packaging changes for CentOS/EPEL
much easier if all the packager utilities
On 12/3/20 10:06 PM, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Is %generate_buildrequires suppose to work for packages
which do not used python ?
Yes, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
From the name I would expect it to, but reading that doc makes me
think
