[EPEL-devel] Re: proposal: EPEL 8 Next

2020-09-09 Thread Patrick Riehecky
On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 12:27 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > This all leads me to think that actually what we want is not "EPEL > Stream" but "EPEL for Stream". (epel-for-stream? epel-4-stream? > epel4s? no not that last one for sure.) From a mulit-language perspective, I prefer not to use '4' in

[EPEL-devel] Re: clusterssh for EPEL 8

2020-07-17 Thread Patrick Riehecky
Can you open a bugzilla requesting this be added to EPEL8? Pat On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 22:01 -0400, Chris Schanzle wrote: > Hi, > > Clusterssh is a nice tool to send input to multiple ssh sessions > simultaneously -- handy for managing a cluster of systems. I don't > know if there is much other

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is it worthwhile to get fedora-review into EPEL8?

2020-12-03 Thread Patrick Riehecky
Can you open a bugzilla requesting the %generate_buildrequires macro be backported to RHEL 8? Pat On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 12:32 -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > I split my time between the latest Fedora and the latest CentOS these > days, and it would make dogfooding packaging changes for

[EPEL-devel] Re: Rebasing nlohmann_json to 3.6.1 in EPEL7

2021-08-05 Thread Patrick Riehecky
On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 10:13 -0500, Carl George wrote: > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:38 PM Kyle Knoepfel > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I am rebasing nlohmann_json from 3.3.1 to 3.6.1 in epel7 to agree > > with the version in epel8. This change is necessary for supporting > > a new epel7 package

[EPEL-devel] Re: GIMP future in RHEL-9

2022-01-04 Thread Patrick Riehecky
Exciting news, is there a link to the ticket(s) the GIMP folks need help with? Odds are I'm not qualified but I'd be happy to look. Pat On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 10:46 +0100, Josef Řídký wrote: > Hi folks, > > just want to send some heads up info about the GIMP package in the > RHEL-9 release. >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

2022-06-17 Thread Patrick Riehecky via epel-devel
On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 06:33 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson > > wrote: > > > > > > I'm totally top-posting, and I apologize for that. > > > > > > For right now, I'm going to put my enable-crb

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

2022-06-06 Thread Patrick Riehecky via epel-devel
I realize this is a bit of a pipe dream, but is there "some way" to ship a repo file from EPEL that points to the crb repo(s)? Folks not wanting it could block the package/not install weak deps. Getting the right repos is a bit tricky but I figured I'd voice the idea... Pat On Sat, 2022-06-04

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL2RHEL - New Wording? - New Workflow?

2023-03-16 Thread Patrick Riehecky via epel-devel
On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:05 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 3:43 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 03:10:23PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > > > This is what I have on my ticket.  Respond soon (by tomorrow end > > > of day) if > > > you think I need

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL2RHEL - New Wording? - New Workflow?

2023-03-17 Thread Patrick Riehecky via epel-devel
On Fri, 2023-03-17 at 07:09 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 6:48 AM Patrick Riehecky > wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-03-17 at 06:22 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 6:31 PM Patrick Riehecky via epel-devel > > > wrote: > > &

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL2RHEL - New Wording? - New Workflow?

2023-03-17 Thread Patrick Riehecky via epel-devel
On Fri, 2023-03-17 at 06:22 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 6:31 PM Patrick Riehecky via epel-devel > wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:05 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 3:43 PM Kevin Fenzi &g