EPEL [HEADS UP] Mongodb 2.4.6 upgrade - Nov 7

2013-09-23 Thread Troy Dawson
Troy Dawson ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

Re: EPEL Need help regarding of a broken dependency notification

2013-09-23 Thread Troy Dawson
On 09/22/2013 07:27 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: Hello, I have got the following notification message from the buildsystem. Because I'm wondering about this message, I would ask, which action is required to avoid this message. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt - Forwarded message from

Re: EPEL [HEADS UP] Mongodb 2.4.6 upgrade - Oct 7

2013-10-07 Thread Troy Dawson
Hello, I only had positive tests from everyone, so I have marked mongodb-2.4.6-1.el6 as stable. It usually takes a few days for it to make it into the repo and pushed out to the mirrors. So expect it within a week. Thank You Troy Dawson On 09/23/2013 03:49 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: Hello

[EPEL-devel] EPEL7 Bad-Dependencies Tracking Bug

2018-11-07 Thread Troy Dawson
Hi, I'm going through the lists of EPEL7 packages that are not able to be installed on RHEL 7.6, and opening bugzilla's for them. I am keeping track of all those bugs with a tracker bug.[1] My apologies to the epel-release maintainers for using their package for the tracker. I've only created 6

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL7 Bad-Dependencies Tracking Bug

2018-11-08 Thread Troy Dawson
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > Hi, > I'm going through the lists of EPEL7 packages that are not able to be > installed on RHEL 7.6, and opening bugzilla's for them. I am keeping > track of all those bugs with a tracker bug.[1] > My apologies t

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL7 Bad-Dependencies Tracking Bug

2018-11-14 Thread Troy Dawson
bug.cgi?id=1647581 - No Comment xfce4-vala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647569 - Rebuilt - On QA On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:35 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I'm going through the lists o

[EPEL-devel] EPEL7 obsoleted packages

2019-01-23 Thread Troy Dawson
There are a set of packages in EPEL7 that have been obsoleted by other packages (mostly) in EPEL7. Many have been obsoleted for several years. I would like permission to remove these obsoleted packages, similar in the way that I cleaned up many of the failed to install packages. I will open a

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL7 Bad-Dependencies Tracking Bug

2018-11-19 Thread Troy Dawson
My apologies for delaying my work on this. Priorities got shifted so I'm starting this work today. On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:50 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 13:00, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > Here are the list of packages with bad dependenc

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-8 plans and needed work

2018-11-19 Thread Troy Dawson
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:00 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 11/17/18 4:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > I'm afraid I'm still very unfamiliar with modules, but it does seem like > > this will be very central to how we deliver packages to EPEL-8. My > > initial questions are: > > Yeah, I don't

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL/CentOS 8.x and KDE

2019-04-08 Thread Troy Dawson
Yes. There are several of us that are KDE users (Well, I am, and I assume there are others). It will probably be a case of figuring out who is the maintainer or if we do it as a group. There are a few of us who have rebuilt it already for RHEL8 Beta. As far as I know, I am the only one who is

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL7 Python34 to Python36 now in updates

2019-03-13 Thread Troy Dawson
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:56 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > The epel7 python rebuild has finished. All of the resulting packages > are now in Bohdi updates. > They will remain in updates until at least April 2. > They have not made it into epel-testing yet. > Due to a Bohdi bug [1

[EPEL-devel] Re: borgbackup: Rebuilt to change main python from 3.4 to 3.6

2019-03-11 Thread Troy Dawson
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:19 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 3/9/19 7:16 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 9:47 AM Benjamin Pereto > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I saw that you rebuilt borgbackup ( > >> ht

[EPEL-devel] Re: Epel7 Questions: Python34 - 36 transition

2019-03-11 Thread Troy Dawson
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:16 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 3/9/19 7:15 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > Hello, > > There are a few questions I have, and since I'm not positive who all > > of the correct people ask are, I'm sending to the epel-devel list. > > > > Bef

[EPEL-devel] EPEL7 Python34 to Python36 now in updates

2019-03-12 Thread Troy Dawson
The epel7 python rebuild has finished. All of the resulting packages are now in Bohdi updates. They will remain in updates until at least April 2. They have not made it into epel-testing yet. Due to a Bohdi bug [1], we had to break up the updates. So we now have 6 updates, that we will treat as

[EPEL-devel] Re: Epel7 Questions: Python34 - 36 transition

2019-03-11 Thread Troy Dawson
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:42 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11. 03. 19 15:54, Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:16 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > >> On 3/9/19 7:15 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> There are a fe

[EPEL-devel] Re: borgbackup: Rebuilt to change main python from 3.4 to 3.6

2019-03-09 Thread Troy Dawson
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 9:47 AM Benjamin Pereto wrote: > > Hi, > > I saw that you rebuilt borgbackup ( > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/borgbackup) for python3.6. > > thanks for that! > > Now I wanted to build a new package with the new upstream release and ran in > some issues to deploy.

[EPEL-devel] Epel7 Questions: Python34 - 36 transition

2019-03-09 Thread Troy Dawson
Hello, There are a few questions I have, and since I'm not positive who all of the correct people ask are, I'm sending to the epel-devel list. Before I start the questions, thank you to everyone who helped out in getting the build failures working. Thank you. thank you. thank you. We have all

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed EPEL policy change: Release based package lifetimes

2019-02-15 Thread Troy Dawson
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:34 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 09:39, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > I want to make sure I'm reading this right. > > A packager puts a package into EPEL. > > If the user does nothing, that package continues to be i

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposed EPEL policy change: Release based package lifetimes

2019-02-15 Thread Troy Dawson
I want to make sure I'm reading this right. A packager puts a package into EPEL. If the user does nothing, that package continues to be in EPEL. If the user wishes to end support, they sent off and email, compose one final build (if it can compose), wait for it to land, then send off another

[EPEL-devel] Old EPEL packages in Bodhi testing

2019-04-15 Thread Troy Dawson
tdisco-1.1-1.el6"] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-4742 2011-12-31 19:07:08 ["trac-peerreview-plugin-0.11-5.svn11062.el6"] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-0004 Troy Dawson epel-list-2012 Description: Binary data epel-list-2014 Des

[EPEL-devel] Re: Project plans for EL-8 (2019-05-15 good til 2019-05-22)

2019-05-17 Thread Troy Dawson
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 6:50 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said: > > RHEL-8 was built with various packages which are not shipped in > > BaseOS/AppStream/CRB. Some like screen are in the buildroot for the > > packages which depend on them but were decided not

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL 8 Branch Strategy

2019-05-30 Thread Troy Dawson
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:18 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > As discussed in the EPEL SIG meeting yesterday, I've written up my > > thoughts on how to handle epel8 branches. > > TLDR: I like it. ;) > > > # Considerations > > * The process must be simple for a Fedora packager to adapt to > > * It

[EPEL-devel] Re: KDE rebuild for RHEL8

2019-05-09 Thread Troy Dawson
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:38 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 5/8/19 4:09 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:03 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > >> > >> I have uploaded my build to my fedora people area. Unfortunately the > >> source rpm's w

[EPEL-devel] Re: KDE rebuild for RHEL8

2019-05-08 Thread Troy Dawson
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:03 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > I have uploaded my build to my fedora people area. Unfortunately the > source rpm's wouldn't fit. I'll work on getting just the packages > that I changed into the source rpm area. Hopefully that trims it down > for those t

[EPEL-devel] Re: What happened to the 'python34-pycurl' and 'python34-mysql' packages?

2019-04-30 Thread Troy Dawson
the latest, and "other" python version (python3_other_pkgversion), then that package now has python34- and python36- What to do? Open a bugzilla on the package, requesting that it be fixed so it builds for both versions of python. Troy Dawson

[EPEL-devel] Re: The use of the playground

2019-08-13 Thread Troy Dawson
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:22 AM Mattias Ellert wrote: > > Hi! > > I recently had a discussion about the use of the playground on > pagure.io: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8582 > > I was asked to bring the discussion here to epel-devel. > > I quote my last comment from the thread below. If you

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-16 Thread Troy Dawson
epel8-playground > > issue. I wonder how many other people had or will have the same > > problem. I assume this is going to fix the problem and if not I will > > follow up. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dave > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 06:25:41AM -07

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-15 Thread Troy Dawson
cted] HEAD -> epel8-playground (pre-receive hook declined) > error: failed to push some refs to > 'ssh://d...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/singularity.git' > Could not execute push: Failed to execute command. > > Dave > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 02:47:08PM -0700, Troy Dawson

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8 not finding buildroot overrides

2019-08-15 Thread Troy Dawson
Oh ... then there really is a problem. 12 hours (or longer) is a very long time for a package to not make it into the repo. The longest I had to wait was 4 hours, because I was doing things in the middle of the F31 mass rebuild. I'm afraid helping with this is above my fedora permissions. I

[EPEL-devel] Re: What to do about missing gcc-objc from RHEL8?

2019-08-15 Thread Troy Dawson
Note: I am not an expert of gcc-objc. I just see that it wasn't built with the RHEL8 gcc and I'm answering accordingly. Someone else might have different, better answers. On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 9:14 AM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > What to do about missing gcc-objc from RHEL8? Open a customer

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8 not finding buildroot overrides

2019-08-14 Thread Troy Dawson
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 6:39 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 6:36 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 23:36, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> > >> I have hdf5 (amongst others) in a buildroot override b

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8 not finding buildroot overrides

2019-08-14 Thread Troy Dawson
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 6:36 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 23:36, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> I have hdf5 (amongst others) in a buildroot override but when I tried to >> build OpenImageIO I got the following errors in root.log: >> Where is the link to that

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

2019-08-12 Thread Troy Dawson
Looks like you need at least fedpkg-1.37-3.el7 for it to work with the playground stuff, so you should be good. When I did the branches for KDE (about 350 of them) there were 6 that didn't properly branch to epel8-playground. They *said* they were branched, but they weren't. I was able to push and

[EPEL-devel] Re: Pidgin on EPEL8

2019-08-07 Thread Troy Dawson
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:44 AM Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote: > > > El 7/8/19 a las 12:30, Stephen John Smoogen escribió: > > > > On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 10:52, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: >> >> Hello all. >> >> While building my Fedora packages for EPEL8, got a very strange error on >>

[EPEL-devel] Re: partclone-0.3.12-1.el7 fails to clone and restore FAT12 partition

2019-08-08 Thread Troy Dawson
/koji/buildinfo?buildID=991833 If the arch you want it x86_64, here is the link (so you don't have to go to the build page first) https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/partclone/0.3.11/1.el7/x86_64/partclone-0.3.11-1.el7.x86_64.rpm If you need so

[EPEL-devel] Re: itstool missing in aarch64 and s390x

2019-08-26 Thread Troy Dawson
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 2:05 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 08:31, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > > > The package "itstool" seems to be missing in some architectures (s390x > > and aarch64) although it should be provided by RHEL server rpms. It > > appears to be available

[EPEL-devel] KDE now available on EPEL 8 ... playground

2019-09-03 Thread Troy Dawson
# KDE now available on EPEL 8 playground Many thanks to all those who have helped make this happen. ## Why playground only KDE on EPEL 8 really needs to be in modules.[1] So we don't have to pull all the KDE packages out of normal EPEL8, we have chosen to only have them in EPEL8 playground,

[EPEL-devel] Re: Koschei enablement for EPEL 8

2019-08-28 Thread Troy Dawson
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:19 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:15:47AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > Fedora infrastructure has been asked [1] to enable Koschei [2] for > > EPEL 8. Would this be useful to anyone? > > Yes. > > > If yes, which of build targets > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Rules for shadowing RHEL packages with EPEL modules

2019-08-26 Thread Troy Dawson
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:27 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > The following answers are just my opinions and not policy. > > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 06:52, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > Case: RHEL delivers an M module with no default stream, there is no S > > stream. > > Can I add a new S stream

[EPEL-devel] Re: Code Ready Builder

2019-08-26 Thread Troy Dawson
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:21 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 11:03, Paul Howarth wrote: > > > > The EL-8 non-default repo Code Ready Builder is primarily targeted at > > developers, but it looks to me like it's going to be a required repo > > for a lot of EPEL-8 users,

[EPEL-devel] Re: Modules and EPEL8-Playground

2019-09-05 Thread Troy Dawson
ng with modules, you start with non-playground. Option 3, I don't like. -testing should have nothing to do with -playground. I'm not against the -playground packages going through bodhi, but I am against modules going through bodhi, but regular rpm's not going through it. Troy D

[EPEL-devel] Re: KDE now available on EPEL 8 ... playground

2019-09-20 Thread Troy Dawson
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:12 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 9:09 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > > On 9/3/19 3:01 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > # KDE now available on EPEL 8 playground > > > > > > Many thanks to all those who

[EPEL-devel] Re: KDE now available on EPEL 8 ... playground

2019-09-20 Thread Troy Dawson
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 9:09 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 9/3/19 3:01 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > # KDE now available on EPEL 8 playground > > > > Many thanks to all those who have helped make this happen. > > Thanks! > > > [3] - Currently gdm does not