The Fedora fuse package currently builds rpms called fuse/fuse-libs and
fuse3/fuse3-libs, the former for fuse-2 versions and the latter for
fuse-3. The community I support has a need for fuse3/fuse3-libs on
EPEL, so I would like to backport them from Fedora to EPEL. Does anyone
have an objection to this? I plan to make a pagure issue on it for
EPSCO review.
The need for this is to take advantage of a feature beginning in
libfuse-3.3.0 that enables pre-mounting fuse filesystems.
https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/releases/tag/fuse-3.3.0
We want to add an option to singularity to pre-mount fuse and then run
the fuse filesystem code inside of el6 & el7 containers, in particular
the CernVM FileSystem which is based on fuse.
https://github.com/cvmfs/cvmfs
The package maintainer is cooperating with me on this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696454
Since RHEL already includes fuse/fuse-libs rpms, my intention is to
update the .spec file so those will not build on el6 & 7, leaving only
fuse3/fuse3-libs. On the other hand, I'm not sure rpmbuild will be
happy with having a fuse.spec that does not generate a fuse rpm, I will
try it. I guess the alternative would be to split fuse3 out into a
separate pagure/bodhi/koji package but it would be good to avoid that.
Dave
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
