Definitely not the recommended way if you want web apps. Use the
package from your distro or build it yourself from sources.
> Regards,
>
> Jeremiah
>
> ___
> epiphany-list mailing list
> epiphany-list@gnome.org
> h
El mar, 11-10-2016 a las 11:06 -0500, Michael Catanzaro escribió:
> On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 17:21 +0200, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
> >
> > I think they are important and I missed them a lot when we moved to
> > use
> > a header bar with the location entry only. And e
ecome inaccessible.
>
> >
> > I even think we can
> > move 'Inspect Element' to the hamburger menu, so using the
> > inspector
> > on
> > web pages with context menu disabled can be easier.
>
> Inspect Element can't move because it depends on the element
&
hat as such, so when the
web app is for gmail I would not copy any cookie.
> Michael
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771540
> ___
> epiphany-list mailing list
> epiphany-list@gnome.org
> https://ma
ome design love.
> Not sure it's worth a new bugzilla issue.
Sure, please.
> Jérémy
> ___
> epiphany-list mailing list
> epiphany-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
--
Carlos Garcia Campos
http://pgp.r
El mié, 05-11-2014 a las 06:54 -0600, Michael Catanzaro escribió:
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 08:08 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
I've added 3 more tasks (assigned to me :-P) user scripts, popup
blocker
(Jon already started with the design) and one process per site model.
OK, great. One
automatically
* Cache size dramatically exceeds limit
--
Carlos Garcia Campos
http://pgp.rediris.es:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xF3D322D0EC4582C3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
epiphany-list mailing list
epiphany-list
quite well in general.
The main problem is probably the memory consumption, as the only process
model supported for now is one process per tab, but other than that the
advantages are really worth it IMO.
So what do you think about enabling one process per tab by default for
3.12?
--
Carlos Garcia
