[equinox-dev] Equinox contribution to Galileo M7 Build

2009-04-28 Thread Thomas Watson
The map file has been updated for the following Bug changes: + Bug 272072. Splash image is tiled in some circumstances (FIXED) The following projects have changed: org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.cocoa.macosx.x86_64 org.eclipse.equinox.launcher. org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.cocoa.macosx. org.eclipse

Re: [equinox-dev] osgi.resolver.usesMode in PDE

2009-04-28 Thread Tom Huybrechts
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Thomas Watson wrote: >> >> PDE uses its own set of configuration properties for the resolver at >> development time. PDE could have an option to add that property to the >> configuration of the resolver sta

Re: [equinox-dev] osgi.resolver.usesMode in PDE

2009-04-28 Thread Chris Aniszczyk
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Thomas Watson wrote: > PDE uses its own set of configuration properties for the resolver at > development time. PDE could have an option to add that property to the > configuration of the resolver state used in PDE. This is not something > Equinox can control thou

Re: [equinox-dev] Support for the console in Equinox

2009-04-28 Thread Richard S. Hall
On 4/28/09 9:26 AM, Thomas Watson wrote: We have had a long time desire to remove the console from the framework. It adds a bit of bulk and is not needed in many scenarios. As such we are not doing much to enhance the console at this time. When an implementation becomes available for RFC 147

Re: [equinox-dev] osgi.resolver.usesMode in PDE

2009-04-28 Thread Thomas Watson
PDE uses its own set of configuration properties for the resolver at development time. PDE could have an option to add that property to the configuration of the resolver state used in PDE. This is not something Equinox can control though. You should probably open a bug against PDE-UI to conside

Re: [equinox-dev] Support for the console in Equinox

2009-04-28 Thread Thomas Watson
We have had a long time desire to remove the console from the framework. It adds a bit of bulk and is not needed in many scenarios. As such we are not doing much to enhance the console at this time. When an implementation becomes available for RFC 147 we would prefer this to be a separate bundle

Re: [equinox-dev] Security Doubt

2009-04-28 Thread BJ Hargrave
You can configure your system to support this. Note: since using permission is invasive in Java code (doPrivileged), all the bundles, in particular B, must be properly coded with the necessary doPrivileges to make it work. -- BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO o

[equinox-dev] osgi.resolver.usesMode in PDE

2009-04-28 Thread Tom Huybrechts
Hi, I'm using osgi.resolver.usesMode=ignore in my build. I need this to get around some problems in the uses clauses of generated manifests that I do not control. Is it possible to enable this mode in the IDE too ? Apparently just adding it to eclipse.ini does not help. Tom __

[equinox-dev] Security Doubt

2009-04-28 Thread David Conde
Hi , I have a doubt about permissions in Equinox, I would like to have the next scenario. I would like to have a set of bundles called A,A1, A2 running in Equinox, which are able to communicate and know about bundle B, but they do not know about the existence of bundle C, all of them running as