RE: [equinox-dev] DS invocation order of bind and activate(timing issue???)

2008-02-25 Thread Thomas Watson
02/25/2008 07:46 AM Subject: RE: [equinox-dev] DS invocation order of bind and activate(timing issue???) Hi, the timeouts of the SCR are gone if I use the latest build of the ds (org.eclipse.equinox.ds_1.0.0

RE: [equinox-dev] DS invocation order of bind and activate(timing issue???)

2008-02-25 Thread Foerster, Stefan
ported before. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of BJ Hargrave Sent: Fri 22.02.2008 20:05 To: Equinox development mailing list Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] DS invocation order of bind and activate(timing issue???) I think you should put this in a bug report against DS. --

RE: [equinox-dev] DS invocation order of bind and activate(timing issue???)

2008-02-25 Thread O'Flynn, Dennis
development mailing list Subject: RE: [equinox-dev] DS invocation order of bind and activate(timing issue???) I think I've got a test case and test sequence to reproduce the timing problem. The problem arises from the start order of the bundles. if the framework starts the bundles in the foll

Re: [equinox-dev] DS invocation order of bind and activate (timing issue???)

2008-02-22 Thread BJ Hargrave
I think you should put this in a bug report against DS. -- BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance [EMAIL PROTECTED] office: +1 386 848 1781 mobile: +1 386 848 3788 From: "Foerster, Stefan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: equinox-dev@eclipse.org Date:

Re: [equinox-dev] DS invocation order of bind and activate (timing issue???)

2008-02-22 Thread Thomas Watson
The optional reference from A1 to B1 creates a cycle. The DS implementation should be able to handle this since the reference is optional it should be able to break the cycle and I assume provide a consistent activation order of A1 and B1. I recommend opening a bug against Equinox->Bundles to tr