the other issue was wanting to enable cases where unpack200 was not in
the JRE but yet could be supplied separately.
Jeff
Andrew Niefer wrote:
As Pascal mentioned, when we first started experimenting with Pack200
we had memory problems. It seemed that Pack200's internal data was
static and not cleared between each jar that was packed. So once we
had packed a reasonable number of jars we started running out of memory.
It could be that we had been doing something wrong. It is also
possible that we could work around this by playing with class loaders
(under the assumption that if the classloader was garbage collected,
all that static memory would go away).
-Andrew
*Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/25/2008 02:53 AM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
Just out of curiosity, why do you use the external binary to do the
pack/unpack and not the java.util.jar.Pack200 class? It seems to me that
a fragment that is EE dependent (require Java 1.5 or higher) would be
ideal here. Those who run lower then Java 5 simply would not have
pack200 which is kind of natural isn't it?
- thomas
Jeff McAffer wrote:
right but there is the practical detail that the exe you need comes
with Java 5 or later and the licensing does not likely allow you to
ship just the unpack200 exe. But that is a matter for someone's legal
team. As John says, the unpack support simply cares whether or not
the exe is there.
What we really need is an open source implementation of unpack that
runs on/with Foundation...
Jeff
John Arthorne wrote:
Just to clarify, the JRE level doesn't matter here. Unpack is
performed by a standalone unpack200 executable that doesn't require
presence of a JVM. You can run with a Foundation class library, plus
a standalone unpack200 executable from Java 5 or Java 6.
*Jim Colson [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/24/2008 09:18 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
how would that work on J2ME (CDC/Foundatoin)?
Jim Colson, Chief Architect - IBM Client Software
Distinguished Engineer
IBM Academy of Technology
Board Member - IT Architect Certification
11501 Burnet Rd. Austin, TX 78758
Ph 512-823-7357, Fax 512-838-0962
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin: Sandra Wallis 512-838-3241
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
Pascal Rapicault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Equinox development mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
Date:
01/24/2008 08:11 PM
Subject:
[equinox-dev] [prov] Download manager support for pack200
I seem to remember that someone was working on adding to support to our
download manager to favor downloading pack200'ed artifacts over
canonical
ones.
Did that ever made it into the code?
Thx
PaScaL
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
___
equinox-dev mailing list
