On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Oleg Besedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What would you like to see in the extension registry 2010?
I just looked at
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_Extension_Registry_Work_Objects. I
like that you plan to use constructor and setter injection, this has a
lot of
Not to throw a fly in the ointment, but some of the designs being
discussed would not work on CDC/Foundation 1.1. With Eclipse based
solutions being deployed on more and more mobile devices, I think this
should be an important consideration. If we introduce non-Foundation
compatible, we'd prob
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Mark Rogalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not to throw a fly in the ointment, but some of the designs being discussed
> would not work on CDC/Foundation 1.1.
Mark, what are you referring to? Being able to use annotations in
client code, for use with dependency
My comment was meant generically. But annotations is an example of
something not supported on CDC VMs.
- Forwarded by Mark Rogalski/Austin/IBM on 09/26/2008 01:49 PM -
"Boris Bokowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/26/2008 01:10 PM
Please respond to
Equinox developme
The plan is looking pretty good. Below are a few comments. In some
places I did some changes (I marked these in the comments below). These
should have your review. Please add or tweak as needed in the next few
days so we can meet the Tuesday deadline
Jeff
General
- the bugs referred to fr
