Re: [equinox-dev] Conceptual problem with OSGi

2008-10-30 Thread BJ Hargrave
It would be better to ask this question on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list since it is a general OSGi question and not tied to Equinox's implementation. -- BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance [EMAIL PROTECTED] office: +1 386 848 1781 mobile: +1

[equinox-dev] Status on 3.5M3

2008-10-30 Thread Thomas Watson
From a framework and compendium POV M3 is ready. I also think components and server-side are done for M3. Is p2 ready to declare M3? Tom - Forwarded by Thomas Watson/Austin/IBM on 10/30/2008 11:16 AM -

[equinox-dev] Re: [p2-dev] Status on 3.5M3

2008-10-30 Thread Pascal Rapicault
We are. From: Thomas Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: equinox-dev@eclipse.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]